Research interests | Key Publications | Academic distinctions | All Publications | CV - English German

Research interests

Judgment and decision making • Cooperation • Open Science • Intuition • Stereotypes and discrimination • Cross-cultural studies • Eye-Tracking • Computational modelling • Neuronal networks • Behavioral economics • Empirical legal studies

Key Publications

• Dorrough, A. R., Köbis, N., Irlenbusch, B., Shalvi, S., & Glöckner, A. (2023). Conditional bribery: Insights from incentivized experiments across 18 nations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 120(18), e2209731120. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2209731120 [data and materials on OSF]

• Jekel, M., Glöckner, A., & Bröder, A. (2018). A new and unique prediction for cue-search in a parallel-constraint satisfaction network model: the attraction search effect. Psychological Review, 125, 744-768. https://doi.org/10.1037/rev0000107 [data and materials on OSF]

• Dorrough, A. R., & Glöckner, A. (2016). Multinational investigation of cross-societal cooperation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113, 10836-10841. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1601294113  [data on OSF]

• Open Science Collaboration. (2015). Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science. Science, 349(6251). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aac4716 [data and materials on OSF]

• Glöckner, A., Hilbig, B. E., & Jekel, M. (2014). What is Adaptive about Adaptive Decision Making? A Parallel Constraint Satisfaction Account. Cognition, 133, 641-666. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2014.08.017 [data and materials on OSF]

• Glöckner, A., & Pachur, T. (2012). Cognitive models of risky choice: Parameter stability and predictive accuracy of prospect theory. Cognition, 123, 21-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2011.12.002  [data and materials on OSF]

All Publications

• M., Nuding, S., Schramm, L., Glöckner, A., Gruber, R., Hajek, K., Häusser, J., Imhoff, R., & Rudert, S. (in press). How the pandemic affected psychological research. Royal Society Open Science. 

• Leising, D., Liesefeld, H., Buecker, S., Glöckner, A., & Lortsch, S. (in press). A tentative roadmap for consensus-building processes. Personality Science. https://doi.org/10.1177/27000710241298610 

• Glöckner, A., Gollwitzer, M., Hahn, L., Lange, J., Sassenberg, K., & Unkelbach, C. (in press). Quality, Replicability, and Transparency in Research in Social Psychology: Implementation of Recommendations in Germany. Social Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000548 

• Glöckner, A., & Fiedler, S. (2024). The Future of Social Perception Models: Further Directions for Theoretical Development of the Inductive Reasoning Model. Psychological Inquiry, 35(1), 30–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/1047840X.2024.2366793

• Glöckner, A., & Fiedler, S. (2024). “Theory Specification and Theory Building in Psychology”: A Topical Issue of the Zeitschrift für Psychologie. Zeitschrift Für Psychologie, 232(1), 68–70. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000541

• Glöckner, A., Jekel, M., & Lisovoj, D. (2024). Using machine learning to evaluate and enhance models of probabilistic inference. Decision, 11(4), 633–651. https://doi.org/10.1037/dec0000233 [data and materials on OSF]

• Glöckner, A., Gollwitzer, M., Hahn, L., Lange, J., Sassenberg, K., & Unkelbach, C. (2024). Quality, Replicability, and Transparency in Research in Social Psychology: Implementation of Recommendations in Germany. Social Psychology, 55(3), 134–147. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000548

• Glöckner, A. (2024). Big Data und Quick Data: Konsequenz für eine effiziente Wissenschaft. In R. Niemann, M. Wendland & J. Zollner (Eds.), Smart Regulation: Quick Data or Big Data (pp. 3-12).Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck. https://doi.org/10.1628/978-3-16-162203-8 [Link]

• Andrighetto, G., Szekely, A., Guido, A., Gelfand, M., Abernathy, J., Arikan, G., ... & Eriksson, K. (2024). Changes in social norms during the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic across 43 countries. Nature Communications, 15(1), 1436. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-44999-5 [data and materials on OSF]

• Andersson, P. A., Vartanova, I., Västfjäll, D., Tinghög, G., Strimling, P., Wu, J., ...  & Eriksson, K. (2024). Anger and disgust shape judgments of social sanctions across cultures, especially in high individual autonomy societies. Scientific Reports, 14(1), 5591. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-55815-x [data and materials on OSF]

• Dorrough, A. R., Köbis, N., Irlenbusch, B., Shalvi, S., & Glöckner, A. (2023). Conditional bribery: Insights from incentivized experiments across 18 nations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 120(18), e2209731120. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2209731120 [data and materials on OSF] 

• Scharf, S. E., Jekel, M., & Glöckner, A. (2022). Awareness of option attractiveness increases the attraction search effect: Modelling the awareness effect in an extended iCodes model. Decision, 9, 43-59. https://doi.org/10.1037/dec0000162 [data and materials on OSF]

• Schäfer, S. J., Simsek, M., Jaspers, E., Kros, M., Hewstone, M., Schmid, K., Fell, B. F., Dorrough, A. R., Glöckner, A., & Christ, O. (2022). Dynamic contact effects: Individuals’ positive and negative contact history influences intergroup contact effects in a behavioral game. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 123, 107-122. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000374 [data and materials on OSF]

• Leising, D., Thielmann, I., Glöckner, A., Gärtner, A., & Schönbrodt, F. (2022). Ten steps toward a better personality science – a Rejoinder to the Comments. Personality Science, 3, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.5964/ps.7961 [data and materials on OSF]

• Leising, D., Thielmann, I., Glöckner, A., Gärtner, A., & Schönbrodt, F. (2022). Ten steps toward a better personality science – How quality may be rewarded more in research evaluation. Personality Science, 3, 1-44. https://doi.org/10.5964/ps.v3i  

• Rosner, A., Basieva, I., Barque-Duran, A., Glöckner, A., von Helversen, B., Khrennikov, A., & Pothos, E. M. (2022). Ambivalence in decision making: an eye tracking study. Cognitive Psychology, 134, 101464. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2022.101464 [data and materials on OSF]

• Lange, J., Unkelbach, C., Glöckner, A., Gollwitzer, M., Kaiser, F. G., & Sassenberg, K. (2022). Das Zusammenspiel von Theorie und Methodik. Psychologische Rundschau, 73, 18-52. https://doi.org/10.1026/0033-3042/a000565 

• Anderl, C., Dorrough, A. R., Rohrbeck, M., & Glöckner, A. (2021). The effects of trait social anxiety on affective and behavioral reactions to others' resource allocations. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 35(2), Article e2259. https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.2259 [data and materials study 1 on OSF] [data and materials study 2 on OSF]

• Bröder, A., Scharf, S. E., Jekel, M., Glöckner, A., & Franke, N. (2021). Salience effects in information acquisition: No evidence for a top-down coherence influence. Memory & Cognition, 49, 1537-1554. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-021-01188-9 [data and materials on OSF]

• Eriksson, K., Strimling, P., Gelfand, M., … Glöckner, A., … (2021). Perceptions of the appropriate response to norm violation in 57 societies. Nature Communications, 12, Article 1481. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-21602-9 [data and materials on OSF]

• Fiedler, S., Glöckner, A., & Hellmann, M. (2021). Altruistic giving towards refugees: Identifying factors that increase citizens’ willingness to help. Frontiers in Psychology, 12(3127). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.689184 [data and materials on OSF]

• Froehlich, L., Dorrough, A. R., Glöckner, A. & Stürmer, S. (2021). Similarity predicts cross-national social preferences. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 12(8), 1486-1498. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550620982704 [data and materials on OSF]

• Hellmann, D. M., Dorrough, A. R., & Glöckner, A. (2021). Prosocial behavior during the COVID-19 pandemic in Germany. The role of responsibility and vulnerability. Heliyon, 7(9), Article e08041. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e08041 [data and materials on OSF]

• Michels, M., Glöckner, A., & Giersch, D. (2021). Personality psychology in times of crisis: profile-specific recommendations on how to deal with COVID-19. Personality and Individual Differences, 174, 110676. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2021.110676 [data and materials on OSF]

• Mischkowski, D., Glöckner, A., & Lewisch, P. (2021). Information search, coherence effects, and their interplay in legal decision making. Journal of Economic Psychology, 87, 102445. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2021.102445 [data and materials on OSF]

• Dorrough, A. R., Olsson, M. I. T., Froehlich, L., Glöckner, A., & Martiny, S. E. (2020). Does she compensate the victim while he punishes the perpetrator? No gender differences in anonymous economic games across 11 nations. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 34(2), 261-274. https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.2208 [data and materials on OSF]

• Glöckner, A. (2020). Legitimität und Rechtsbefolgung: Eine empirisch-psychologische Perspektive. In T. Herbst & S. Zucca-Soest (Eds.), Legitimität des Staates (pp.47-64). Baden-Baden: Nomos.

• Glöckner, A., Renerte, B., & Schmidt, U. (2020). Violations of coalescing in parametric utility measurement. Theory and Decision, 89, 471-501. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11238-020-09761-5

• Fischer, I., Avrashi, S., Oz, T., Fadul, R., Gutman, K., Rubenstein, D., ... & Glöckner, A. (2020). The behavioural challenge of the COVID-19 pandemic: indirect measurements and personalized attitude changing treatments (IMPACT). Royal Society open science, 7(8), 201131. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.201131 [data]

• Betsch, T., Aßmann, L., & Glöckner, A. (2020). Paranormal Beliefs and Individual Differences: Story Seeking without Reasoned Review. Heliyon, 6, e04259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04259 [data and materials on OSF]

• Dorrough, A. R., & Glöckner, A. (2020). Sex differences concerning prosocial behavior in social dilemmas are (partially) mediated by risk preferences but not social preferences. An in-depth analysis across 10 countries. Social Psychology, 52(2), 61-74. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000434 [data and materials on OSF]

• Engel, C., Timme, S., & Glöckner, A. (2020). Coherence-based reasoning and order effects in legal judgments. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 26, 333-352. https://doi.org/10.1037/law0000257 [data and materials on OSF]

• Koch, A., Dorrough, A. R., Glöckner, A., & Imhoff, R. (2020). The ABC of society: Perceived similarity in agency/socioeconomic success and conservative-progressive beliefs increases intergroup cooperation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 90, Article 103996. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2020.103996 [data and materials on OSF]

• Nett, T., Dorrough, A. R., Jekel, M., & Glöckner, A. (2020). Perceived biological and social characteristics of a representative set of German first names. Social Psychology, 51, 17-34. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000383 [data and materials on OSF]

• Jekel, M., Fiedler, S., Allstadt Torras, R., Mischkowski, D., Dorrough, A. R., & Glöckner, A. (2020). How to teach open science principles in the undergraduate curriculum — the Hagen Cumulative Science Project. Psychology Learning & Teaching, 19(1), 91-106. https://doi.org/10.1177/1475725719868149 [data and materials on OSF]

• Waubert de Puiseau, B., Glöckner, A., & Towfigh, E. V. (2019). Integrating theories of law obedience: How utility-theoretic factors, legitimacy, and lack of self-control influence decisions to commit low-level crimes. Judgment and Decision Making, 14, 318-334. [pdf] [data and materials on OSF]

• Dorrough, A. R., & Glöckner, A. (2019). A cross-national analysis of sex differences in prisoner's dilemma games. British Journal of Social Psychology, 58(1), 225-240. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12287 [data and materials on OSF]

• Glöckner, A. (2019). Der Mensch im Spannungsfeld zwischen (begrenzter) Rationalität, Eigeninteresse und Kooperation: Welches Wesen adressiert das Recht? In A. Funke & U. Schmalke (Eds.), Menschenbilder im Recht (pp. 79-91).Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck. https://doi.org/10.1628/978-3-16-157698-0

• Glöckner, A., & Jekel, M. (2019). Testing cognitive models by a joint analysis of multiple dependent measures. In M. Schulte-Mecklenbeck et al. (Eds.), Handbook of Process Tracing (2nd Edition) (pp. 356-373). New York: Routledge.

• Mischkowski, D., Thielmann, I., & Glöckner, A. (2019). Minimizing inequality versus maximizing joint gains: On the relation between personality traits and different prosocial motivations. Journal of Research in Personality, 81, 153-157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2019.06.001  [data and materials on OSF]

• Betsch, T., Lehmann, A., Jekel, M., Lindow, S., & Glöckner, A. (2018). Children's application of decision strategies in a compensatory environment. Judgment and Decision Making, 13, 514-528. [pdf]  [data]

• Fiedler, S., Hellmann, D. M., Dorrough, A., & Glöckner, A. (2018). Cross-national in-group favoritism in prosocial behavior: Evidence from Latin and North America. Judgment and Decision Making, 13(1), 42-60. [pdf]  [data and materials on OSF]

• Glöckner, A., Fiedler, S., & Renkewitz, F. (2018). Belastbare und effiziente Wissenschaft: Strategische Ausrichtung von Forschungsprozessen als Weg aus der Replikationskrise. Psychologische Rundschau, 69, 22-36. https://doi.org/10.1026/0033-3042/a000384

• Glöckner, A., Kube, S., & Nicklisch, A. (2018). The joint benefits of observed and unobserved social sanctions. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, 75, 105-116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2018.05.007  [data and materials on OSF]

• Jekel, M., & Glöckner, A. (2018). How to identify strategy use and adaptive strategy selection: The crucial role of chance correction in weighted compensatory strategies. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 31, 265-279. https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.1983

• Jekel, M., & Glöckner, A. (2018). Meaningful model comparisons have to include reasonable competing models and also all data: A rejoinder to Rieskamp (2018). Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 31, 289-293. https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.2076

• Jekel, M., Glöckner, A., & Bröder, A. (2018). A new and unique prediction for cue-search in a parallel-constraint satisfaction network model: The attraction search effect. Psychological Review, 125, 744-768. https://doi.org/10.1037/rev0000107  [data and materials on OSF]

• Marewski, J. N., Bröder, A., & Glöckner, A. (2018). Some metatheoretical reflections on adaptive decision making and the strategy selection problem. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 31, 181-198. https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.2075

• Mischkowski, D., Glöckner, A., & Lewisch, P. (2018). From spontaneous cooperation to spontaneous punishment – Distinguishing the underlying motives driving spontaneous behavior in first and second order public good games. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 149, 59-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2018.07.001  [data and materials on OSF]

• Mischkowski, D., Thielmann, I., & Glöckner, A. (2018). Think it through before making a choice? Processing mode does not influence social mindfulness. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 74, 85-97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2017.09.001  [data and materials on OSF]

• Stürmer, S., Christ, O., Jonkmann, K., Josephs, I., Gaschler, R., Glöckner, A., … Salewski, C. (2018). 10 Jahre universitäres Fernstudium in Psychologie an der FernUniversität in Hagen. Psychologische Rundschau, 69, 104-108. https://doi.org/10.1026/0033-3042/a000400

• Towfigh, E. V., Traxler, C., & Glöckner, A. (2018). Geschlechts- und Herkunftseffekte bei der Benotung juristischer Staatsprüfungen. Zeitschrift Für Didaktik Der Rechtswissenschaft, 5, 115-142.

• Bassarak, C., Leib, M., Mischkowski, D., Strang, S., Glöckner, A., & Shalvi, S. (2017). What provides justification for cheating—producing or observing counterfactuals? Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 30, 964-975. https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.2013  [data and materials on OSF]

• Bouwmeester, S., Verkoeijen, P. P. J. L., Aczel, B., Barbosa, F., Bègue, L., Brañas-Garza, P., … Glöckner, A., … Mischkowski, D., … Wollbrant, C. E. (2017). Registered Replication Report: Rand, Greene, and Nowak (2012). Perspectives on Psychological Science, 12, 527-542. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691617693624  [data and materials on OSF]

• Dorrough, A., Glöckner, A., Betsch, T., & Wille, A. (2017). When knowledge activated from memory intrudes into decisions from description—The case of stereotypes. Acta Psychologica, 180, 64-78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2017.08.006  [data and materials on OSF]

• Dorrough, A., Glöckner & A. Lee, B. (2017). Race for power in public good games with unequal, unstable punishment power. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 30(2), 582-609. https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.1976  [data and materials on OSF]

• Ashby, N. J. S., Jekel, M., Dickert, S., & Glöckner, A. (2016). Finding the right fit: A comparison of process assumptions underlying popular drift-diffusion models. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 42, 1982-1993. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000279

• Dorrough*, A. R., Leszczyńska*, M., Barreto, M., & Glöckner, A. (2016). Revealing side effects of quota rules on group cooperation. Journal of Economic Psychology, 57, 136-152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2016.09.007 *shared first authorship  [data and materials on OSF]

• Dorrough, A. R., & Glöckner, A. (2016). Multinational investigation of cross-societal cooperation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113(39), 10836-10841. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1601294113  [data on OSF]

• Glöckner, A. (2016). Psychology and disaster: Why we do not see looming disasters and how our way of thinking causes them. Global Policy, 7, 16-24. https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.12289

• Glöckner, A. (2016). The irrational hungry judge effect revisited: Simulations reveal that the magnitude of the effect is overestimated. Judgment and Decision Making, 11, 601-610. [pdf]

• Glöckner, A., Hilbig, B. E., Henninger, F., & Fiedler, S. (2016). The reversed description-experience gap: Disentangling sources of presentation format effects in risky choice. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 145, 486-508. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0040103 [data and materials on OSF]

• Glöckner, A., & Towfigh, E. V. (2016). Messgenauigkeit und Fairness in Staatsprüfungen: Aktuelle Studien zeigen Gruppen-Unterschiede in juristischen Examina auf. Anwaltsblatt, 10, 706-709.

• Hochman, G., Glöckner, A., Fiedler, S., & Ayal, S. (2016). “I can see it in your eyes”: Biased processing and increased arousal in dishonest responses. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 29, 322-335. https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.1932  [data and materials on OSF]

• Mischkowski, D., & Glöckner, A. (2016). Spontaneous cooperation for prosocials, but not for proselfs: Social value orientation moderates spontaneous cooperation behavior. Scientific Reports, 6, 21555. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep21555  [data and materials on OSF]

• Seithe, M., Morina, J., & Glöckner, A. (2016). Bonn eXperimental System (BoXS): An open-source platform for interactive experiments in psychology and economics. Behavior Research Methods, 48, 1454-1475. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-015-0660-6

• Towfigh, E. V., Goerg, S. J., Glöckner, A., Leifeld, P., Llorente-Saguer, A., Bade, S., & Kurschilgen, C. (2016). Do direct-democratic procedures lead to higher acceptance than political representation? Experimental survey evidence from Germany. Public Choice, 167, 47-65. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-016-0330-y

• Ashby, N. J. S., Walasek, L., & Glöckner, A. (2015). The effect of consumer ratings and attentional allocation on product valuations. Judgment and Decision Making, 10, 172-184.  [pdf]  [data and materials]

• Dorrough, A., Glöckner, A., Hellmann, D. M., & Ebert, I. (2015). The development of ingroup favoritism in repeated social dilemmas. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, Article 476. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00476  [data and materials on OSF]

• Fiedler, S., & Glöckner, A. (2015). Attention and moral behavior. Current Opinion in Psychology, 6, 139-144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2015.08.008

• Glöckner, A., & Englich, B. (2015). When relevance matters. Social Psychology, 46, 4-12. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000214

• Glöckner, A., Tontrup, S., & Bechtold, S. (2015). Disentangling psychological sources of overpricing in anticommons dilemmas: Strategic incentives, endowment effects, and interdependence of outcomes. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 28, 224-238. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bdm.1839  [data and materials on OSF]

• Glöckner, A., & Towfigh, E. V. (2015). Entscheidungen zwischen „Intuition“ und „Rationalität“. Deutsche Richterzeitung, 7/8, 14-17.

• Morell, A., Glöckner, A., & Towfigh, E. V. (2015). Sticky rebates: Loyalty rebates impede rational switching of consumers. Journal of Competition Law & Economics, 11, 431-461. https://doi.org/10.1093/joclec/nhv009

• Open Science Collaboration (2015). Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science. Science, 349(6251), aac4716. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aac4716  [data and materials on OSF]

• Engel, C., Beckenkamp, M., Glöckner, A., Irlenbusch, B., Hennig-Schmidt, H., Kube, S., … Towfigh, E. (2014). First impressions are more important than early intervention: Qualifying Broken Windows Theory in the lab. International Review of Law and Economics, 37, 126-136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irle.2013.07.005

• Glöckner, A., & Bröder, A. (2014). Cognitive integration of recognition information and additional cues in memory-based decisions. Judgment and Decision Making, 9, 35-50. [pdf]  [data]

• Glöckner, A., Hilbig, B. E., & Jekel, M. (2014). What is adaptive about adaptive decision making? A parallel constraint satisfaction account. Cognition, 133, 641-666. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2014.08.017  [data and materials on OSF]

• Hilbig, B. E., Glöckner, A., & Zettler, I. (2014). Personality and prosocial behavior: Linking basic traits and social value orientations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 107, 529-539. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036074

• Jekel, M., Glöckner, A., Bröder, A., & Maydych, V. (2014). Approximating rationality under incomplete information: Adaptive inferences for missing cue values based on cue-discrimination. Judgment and Decision Making, 9, 129-147. [pdf]  [data and materials]

• Söllner, A., Bröder, A., Glöckner, A., & Betsch, T. (2014). Single-process versus multiple-strategy models of decision making: Evidence from an information intrusion paradigm. Acta Psychologica, 146, 84-96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2013.12.007

• Towfigh, E. V., Traxler, C., & Glöckner, A. (2014). Zur Benotung in der Examensvorbereitung und im ersten Examen: eine empirische Analyse. Zeitschrift für Didaktik der Rechtswissenschaft, 1, 8-27.

• Bröder, A., Glöckner, A., Betsch, T., Link, D., & Ettlin, F. (2013). Do people learn option or strategy routines in multi-attribute decisions? The answer depends on subtle factors. Acta Psychologica, 143, 200-209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2013.03.005

• Engel, C., & Glöckner, A. (2013). Role-induced bias in court: An experimental analysis. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 26, 272-284. https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.1761

• Fiedler, S., Glöckner, A., Nicklisch, A., & Dickert, S. (2013). Social Value Orientation and information search in social dilemmas: An eye-tracking analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 120, 272-284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2012.07.002

• Glöckner, A., & Engel, C. (2013). Can we trust intuitive jurors? Standards of proof and the probative value of evidence in coherence-based reasoning. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 10, 230-252. https://doi.org/10.1111/jels.12009

• Glöckner, A., Towfigh, E., & Traxler, C. (2013). Development of legal expertise. Instructional Science, 41, 989-1007. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-013-9266-5

• Towfigh, E. V., Glöckner, A., & Reid, R. (2013). Dangerous games: The psychological case for regulating gambling. Charleston Law Review, 8, 148-189.

• Ashby, N. J. S., Dickert, S., & Glöckner, A. (2012). Focusing on what you own: Biased information uptake due to ownership. Judgment and Decision Making, 7, 254-267.  [pdf]  [data]

• Dickert, S., Herbig, B., Glöckner, A., Gansen, C., & Portack, R. (2012). The more the better? Effects of training, experience and information amount in legal judgments. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 26, 223-233. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1813

• Fiedler, S., & Glöckner, A. (2012). The dynamics of decision making in risky choice: An eye-tracking analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 3:335. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00335  [data and materials on OSF]

• Fiedler, S., Glöckner, A., & Nicklisch, A. (2012). The influence of Social Value Orientation on information processing in repeated Voluntary Contribution Mechanism games: An eye-tracking analysis. In A. Innocenti & A. Sirigu (Eds.), Neuroscience and the economics of decision making. New York, NY: Routledge.

• Glöckner, A., & Betsch, T. (2012). Decisions beyond boundaries: When more information is processed faster than less. Acta Psychologica, 139, 532-542. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2012.01.009

• Glöckner, A., Fiedler, S., Hochman, G., Ayal, S., & Hilbig, B. E. (2012). Processing differences between descriptions and experience: A comparative analysis using eye-tracking and physiological measures. Frontiers in psychology, 3, 173. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00173

• Glöckner, A., Heinen, T., Johnson, J. G., & Raab, M. (2012). Network approaches for expert decisions in sports. Human Movement Science, 31, 318-333. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humov.2010.11.002

• Glöckner, A., & Hilbig, B. E. (2012). Risk is relative: Risk aversion yields cooperation rather than defection in cooperation-friendly environments. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 19, 546-553. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-012-0224-z

• Glöckner, A., & Pachur, T. (2012). Cognitive models of risky choice: Parameter stability and predictive accuracy of prospect theory. Cognition, 123, 21-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2011.12.002  [data and materials on OSF]

• Jekel, M., Glöckner, A., Fiedler, S., & Bröder, A. (2012). The rationality of different kinds of intuitive decision processes. Synthese, 189, 147-160. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-012-0126-7

• Ashby, N. J. S., Glöckner, A., & Dickert, S. (2011). Conscious and unconscious thought in risky choice: Testing the capacity principle and the appropriate weighting principle of Unconscious Thought Theory. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, 261. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00261

• Glöckner, A., & Betsch, T. (2011). The empirical content of theories in judgment and decision making: Shortcomings and remedies. Judgment and Decision Making, 6, 711-721.  [pdf]

• Glöckner, A., & Bröder, A. (2011). Processing of recognition information and additional cues: A model-based analysis of choice, confidence, and response time. Judgment and Decision Making, 6, 23-42.  [pdf]

• Glöckner, A., & Ebert, I. D. (2011). Legal intuition and expertise. In M. Sinclair (Ed.), Handbook of intuition research (pp. 157-167). Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing.

• Glöckner, A., & Herbold, A.-K. (2011). An eye-tracking study on information processing in risky decisions: Evidence for compensatory strategies based on automatic processes. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 24, 71-98.

• Glöckner, A., & Hilbig, B. E. (2011). Editorial: Methodology in judgment and decision making research. Judgment and Decision Making, 6, 705-710. [pdf]

• Glöckner, A., & Hochman, G. (2011). The interplay of experience-based affective and probabilistic cues in decision making. Experimental Psychology, 58, 132-141. https://doi.org/10.1027/1618-3169/a000078

• Glöckner, A., & Hodges, S. D. (2011). Parallel constraint satisfaction in memory-based decisions. Experimental Psychology, 58, 180-195. https://doi.org/10.1027/1618-3169/a000084

• Glöckner, A., Irlenbusch, B., Kube, S., Nicklisch, A., & Normann, H.-T. (2011). Leading with(out) sacrifice? A public-goods experiment with a privileged player. Economic Inquiry, 49, 591-597. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-7295.2010.00314.x

• Glöckner, A., & Landsberg, M. (2011). Der Schöffe entscheidet: Eine empirische Studie zum Entscheidungsverhalten von Schöffen. Richter ohne Robe, 23, 44-47.

• Hilbig, B. E., & Glöckner, A. (2011). Yes, they can! Appropriate weighting of small probabilities as a function of information acquisition. Acta Psychologica, 138, 390-396. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2011.09.005

• Jekel, M., Fiedler, S., & Glöckner, A. (2011). Diagnostic task selection for strategy classification in judgment and decision making: Theory, validation, and implementation in R. Judgment and Decision Making, 6, 782-799. [pdf]  [materials]

• Towfigh, E. V., & Glöckner, A. (2011). Game over: Empirical support for soccer bets regulation. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 17, 475-506.

• Betsch, T., & Glöckner, A. (2010). Intuition in judgment and decision making: Extensive thinking without effort. Psychological Inquiry, 21, 279-294. https://doi.org/10.1080/1047840X.2010.517737

• Engel, C., Glöckner, A., & Schönfeldt, K. (2010). Informationsverzerrungen bei rechtlichen Entscheidungen. Richter ohne Robe, 22, 135-136.

• Glöckner, A. (2010). Multiple measure strategy classification: Outcomes, decision times and confidence ratings. In A. Glöckner & C. L. M. Witteman (Eds.), Foundations for tracing intuition: Challenges and methods (pp. 83-105). London, UK: Psychology Press & Routledge.

• Glöckner, A., & Betsch, T. (2010). Accounting for critical evidence while being precise and avoiding the strategy selection problem in a parallel constraint satisfaction approach: A reply to Marewski (2010). Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 23, 468-472.

• Glöckner, A., Betsch, T., & Schindler, N. (2010). Coherence shifts in probabilistic inference tasks. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 23, 439-462.

• Glöckner, A., & Towfigh, E. (2010). Geschicktes Glücksspiel: Die Sportwette als Grenzfall des Glücksspielrechts. JuristenZeitung, 65(21), 1027-1035. https://doi.org/10.1628/002268810793333230

• Glöckner, A., & Witteman, C. L. M. (2010). Beyond dual-process models: A categorisation of processes underlying intuitive judgement and decision making. Thinking & Reasoning, 16, 1-25. https://doi.org/10.1080/13546780903395748

• Glöckner, A., & Witteman, C. L. M. (2010). Foundations for tracing intuition: Challenges and methods. London, UK: Psychology Press & Routledge.

• Glöckner, A., & Witteman, C. L. M. (2010). Foundations for tracing intuition: Models, findings, categorizations. In A. Glöckner & C. L. M. Witteman (Eds.), Foundations for tracing intuition: Challenges and methods (pp. 1-23). London, UK: Psychology Press & Routledge.

• Hochman, G., Ayal, S., & Glöckner, A. (2010). Physiological arousal in processing recognition information: Ignoring or integrating cognitive cues? Judgment and Decision Making, 5, 285-299. [pdf]

• Hochman, G., Glöckner, A., & Yechiam, E. (2010). Physiological measures in identifying decision strategies. In A. Glöckner & C. L. M. Witteman (Eds.), Foundations for tracing intuition: Challenges and methods (pp. 139-159). London, UK: Psychology Press & Routledge.

• Jekel, M., Nicklisch, A., & Glöckner, A. (2010). Implementation of the Multiple-Measure Maximum Likelihood strategy classification method in R: Addendum to Glöckner (2009) and practical guide for application. Judgment and Decision Making, 5, 54-63. [pdf]  [data and materials]

• Witteman, C. L. M., & Glöckner, A. (2010). Tracing intuition: Summing up and exemplified method applications. In A. Glöckner & C. L. M. Witteman (Eds.), Foundations for tracing intuition: Challenges and methods (pp. 272-278). London, UK: Psychology Press & Routledge.

• Glöckner, A. (2009). „Neurorecht“ ohne Psychologie? Die Rolle verhaltenswissenschaftlicher Betrachtungsebenen bei der Ableitung rechtspolitischer Empfehlungen. In S. Schleim, T. M. Spranger, & H. Walter (Eds.), Von der Neuroethik zum Neurorecht? (pp. 104-131). Göttingen, Germany: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.

• Glöckner, A. (2009). Investigating intuitive and deliberate processes statistically: The multiple-measure maximum likelihood strategy classification method. Judgment and Decision Making, 4, 186-199. [pdf]  [data and materials]

• Glöckner, A., & Moritz, S. (2009). A fine-grained analysis of the jumping-to-conclusions bias in schizophrenia: Data-gathering, response confidence, and information integration. Judgment and Decision Making, 4, 587-600. [pdf]

• Glöckner, A., & Schönfeldt, K. (2009). Ich überlege. Mein Bauch entscheidet? - Intuition und Entscheidung. Richter ohne Robe, 21, 60-61.

• Horstmann, N., Ahlgrimm, A., & Glöckner, A. (2009). How distinct are intuition and deliberation? An eye-tracking analysis of instruction-induced decision modes. Judgment and Decision Making, 4, 335-354. [pdf]

• Glöckner, A. (2008). How evolution outwits bounded rationality: The efficient interaction of automatic and deliberate processes in decision making and implications for institutions. In C. Engel & W. Singer (Eds.), Better than conscious? Decision making, the human mind, and implications for institutions (pp. 259-284). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

• Glöckner, A., & Betsch, T. (2008). Do people make decisions under risk based on ignorance? An empirical test of the priority heuristic against cumulative prospect theory. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 107, 75-95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2008.02.003

• Glöckner, A., & Betsch, T. (2008). Modeling option and strategy choices with connectionist networks: Towards an integrative model of automatic and deliberate decision making. Judgment and Decision Making, 3, 215-228. [pdf]

• Glöckner, A., & Betsch, T. (2008). Multiple-reason decision making based on automatic processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34, 1055-1075. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.34.5.1055

• McElreath, R., Boyd, R., Gigerenzer, G., Glöckner, A., Hammerstein, P., Kurzban, R., … Stevens, J. R. (2008). Individual decision making and the evolutionary roots of institutions. In C. Engel & W. Singer (Eds.), Better than conscious? Decision making, the human mind, and implications for institutions (pp. 325-342). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

• Glöckner, A. (2007). Does intuition beat fast and frugal heuristics? A systematic empirical analysis. In H. Plessner, C. Betsch, & T. Betsch (Eds.), Intuition in judgment and decision making (pp. 309-325). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

• Glöckner, A. (2006). Automatische Prozesse bei Entscheidungen. Hamburg, Germany: Kovac.

• Haberstroh, S., Betsch, T., Glöckner, A., Haar, T., & Stiller, A. (2005). The impact of routines on deliberate decisions: The microworld-simulation COMMERCE. In T. Betsch & S. Haberstroh (Eds.), The routines of decision making (pp. 211-229). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

• Betsch, T., Haberstroh, S., Molter, B., & Glöckner, A. (2004). Oops, I did it again—Relapse errors in routinized decision making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 93, 62-74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2003.09.002

• Glöckner, A., & Grüner, K. (2003). Effizientes Online-Verfahren für die Personalentwicklung: 360° Führungsfeedback. Planung & Analyse, 2, 85-90.

• Betsch, T., Haberstroh, S., Glöckner, A., Haar, T., & Fiedler, K. (2001). The effects of routine strength on adaptation and information search in recurrent decision making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 84, 23-53. https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.2000.2916

• Betsch, T., Glöckner, A., & Haberstroh, S. (2000). COMMERCE—A micro-world simulation to study routine maintenance and deviation in repeated decision making. Methods of Psychological Research, 5.  [full text]

Academic distinctions

• Award for Quality Assurance in Psychology of the German Psychological Society (DGPs) for the Network of Open Science Initiatives (NOSI), 2020
• Editor-in-chief Judgment and Decision Making, since 2018
• President of the European Association for Decision Making (EADM), 2017-2019
• Executive board member of the European Association for Decision Making (EADM), 2013-2017
• Vice chairman of the academic advisory council of the Leibniz Institute for Psychology Information (ZPID, Trier), since 2018

• Associate / Action Editor
  • Judgment and Decision Making, 2012-2018
  • Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, 2013-2018
  • Special Issue Methodology in judgment and decision making research for Judgment and Decision Making, 2011
  • Special Issue Strategy Selection for Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 2015-2017

• Member of editorial boards
  • Social Cognition, since 2011
  • Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, since 2012
  • Frontiers in Cognitive Science, since 2011
  • Judgment and Decision Making, 2010-2012

• Research grants from various funding organizations, e.g., German Research Foundation (DFG), German-Israeli Foundation (GIF), Max Planck Society (MPG), European Association for Decision Making (EADM)