2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2000

Please contact socc-couni-koeln.de if you cannot gain access to publications otherwise.

2024

• Andrighetto, G., Szekely, A., Guido, A., Gelfand, M., Abernathy, J., Arikan, G., ... & Eriksson, K. (2024). Changes in social norms during the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic across 43 countries. Nature Communications, 15(1), 1436. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-44999-5 [data and materials on OSF]

• Andersson, P. A., Vartanova, I., Västfjäll, D., Tinghög, G., Strimling, P., Wu, J., ...  & Eriksson, K. (2024). Anger and disgust shape judgments of social sanctions across cultures, especially in high individual autonomy societies. Scientific Reports, 14(1), 5591. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-55815-x [data and materials on OSF]

• Glöckner, A. (2024). Big Data und Quick Data: Konsequenz für eine effiziente Wissenschaft. In R. Niemann, M. Wendland & J. Zollner (Eds.), Smart Regulation: Quick Data or Big Data (pp. 3-12).Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck. https://doi.org/10.1628/978-3-16-162203-8 [Link]

• Saxler, F. M., Dorrough, A. R., Froehlich, L., Block, K., Croft, A., Meeuussen, L., Olsson, M., Schader, T., Schuster, C., van Grootel, S., van Laar, C., Atkinson, C., Benson-Greenwald, T., Birneanu, A., Cavojova, V., Cheryan, S., Chung, A. L. K., Danyliuk, I., Dar-Nimrod, I., , . . . Martiny, S. E. (2024). Did Descriptive and Prescriptive Norms About Gender Equality at Home Change During the COVID-19 Pandemic? A Cross-National Investigation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672231219719 [data and materials on OSF]

2023

• Allstadt Torras, R. C. (2023). Aufnahme und Analyse von Akteninformation. Psychologische Begutachtung, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-64801-8_30-1 

• Allstadt Torras, R. C., Scheel, C. & Dorrough, A. R. (2023). The stereotype content model and mental disorders: Distinct perceptions of warmth and competence. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, Article 1069226. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1069226 [data and materials on OSF]

• Dorrough, A. R., Köbis, N., Irlenbusch, B., Shalvi, S., & Glöckner, A. (2023). Conditional bribery: Insights from incentivized experiments across 18 nations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 120(18), e2209731120. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2209731120 [data and materials on OSF] [data and materials 2 on OSF]

• Rahmani Azad, Z., Goedderz, A., & Hahn, A. (2023). Self-Awareness and Stereotypes: Accurate Prediction of Implicit Gender Stereotyping. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 49(12), 1695-1708. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672221120703

• Schermer, J. A., Rogoza, R., Kwiatkowska, M. M., Kowalski, C. M., Aquino, S., Ardi, R., … Crusius, J. … Krammer, G. (2023). Humor styles across 28 countries. Current Psychology, 42, 16304-16319. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-019-00552-y

• Uğurlar, P., Dorrough, A. R., Isler, O., & Yilmaz, O. (2023). Shared Group Memberships Mitigate Intergroup Bias in Cooperation. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 0(0). https://doi.org/10.1177/19485506231209788 [data and materials on OSF]

2022

• Crusius, J. (2022). Soziale Vergleiche [Social comparison]. In P. Ozimek, H.-W. Bierhoff, E. Rohmann, & S. Hanke (Eds.), Angewandte Sozialpsychologie: Ein Lehrbuch (pp. 27-41). Stuttgart: Kohlhammer.

• Dorrough, A. R., Bick, N., Bring, L., Brockers, C., Butz, C., & Schneider, I. K. (2022). Caring about (COVID-19 related) social issues signals trustworthiness: Direct and conceptual replication of Zlatev (2019). Collabra: Psychology, 8(1), Article 31036. https://doi.org/10.1525/collabra.31036 [data and materials on OSF]

• Dorrough, A. R., Leszczyńska, M., Werner*, S., Schaeffer*, L., Simandi*, F., Galley*, A.-S., Akin*, E., Bachmann*, J., Bruske*, M., & Burghardt*, U. (2022). Equal performance, different grade: Women’s performance in discussion perceived worse than men’s. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 48(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167221992213 [data and materials on OSF] *The 3rd-10th author were students under the supervision of the first author.

• Frank, C., Dorrough, A. R., & Schneider, I. K. (2022). Ambivalence and adherence to preventive measures during the COVID-19 pandemic: Data from the U.S. and Germany. Data in Brief, 42, Article 108124. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2022.108124

• Funk, F.* & Mischkowski, D.* (2022). Examining consequentialist punishment motives in one-shot social dilemmas. Zeitschrift für Psychologie. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000459 [data and materials on OSF] *shared first authorship

• Goedderz, A., & Hahn, A. (2022). Biases left unattended: People are surprised at racial bias feedback until they pay attention to their biased reactions. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 102, 104374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2022.104374

• Lange, J., Unkelbach, C., Glöckner, A., Gollwitzer, M., Kaiser, F. G., & Sassenberg, K. (2022). Fachgruppe Sozialpsychologie. Task Force “Qualitätssicherung sozialpsychologischer Forschung” der Fachgruppe Sozialpsychologie. Das Zusammenspiel von Theorie und Methodik. Psychologische Rundschau, 73(1), 22-24. https://doi.org/10.1026/0033-3042/a000565

• Leising, D., Thielmann, I., Glöckner, A., Gärtner, A., & Schönbrodt, F. (2022). Ten steps toward a better personality science - How quality may be rewarded more in research evaluation. Personality Science, (3): e6029. https://doi.org/10.5964/ps.6029

• Liu, S., Zhu, J.J., Liu, Y.T., Wilbanks, D., Jackson, J. C., Mu Y. (2022) Perception of strong social norms during the COVID-19 pandemic is linked to positive psychological outcomes. BMC Public Health, 22, Article 1403. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-13744-2

• Scharf, S. E., Jekel, M., & Glöckner, A. (2022). Awareness of option attractiveness increases the attraction search effect: Modeling the awareness effect in an extended iCodes model. Decision, 9(1), 43. https://doi.org/10.1037/dec0000162 [data and materials on OSF]

• Schneider, I. K., Dorrough, A. R., & Frank, C. (2022). Ambivalence and self-reported adherence to recommendations to reduce the spread of COVID-19. Social Psychology, 52(6), 362-374. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000465 [data and materials on OSF]

• Walkowitz, G., Belianin, A. & Dorrough, A. R. (2022). Editorial: Inter-cultural cooperation: The role of attitudes, (shared) expectations, and behavioral standards. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, Article 1044588. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1044588

• Wang, J., Liu, S., & Zeng X.H. (2022). Effects of humor styles and individual authenticity on depression among college students. Chinese Journal of Behavioral Medicine and Brain Science, 31(5), 450-454. https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn371468-20211111-00647

2021

• Amit, E., Han, E., Posten, A.-C., & Sloman, S. (2021). How people judge institutional corruption. Connecticut Law Review, 52(3), 1121-1138. [pdf]

• Anderl, C., Dorrough, A. R., Rohrbeck, M., & Glöckner, A. (2021). The effects of trait social anxiety on affective and behavioral reactions to others' resource allocations. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 35(2), Article e2259. https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.2259 [data and materials study 1 on OSF] [data and materials study 2 on OSF]

• Bröder, A., Scharf, S. E., Jekel, M., Glöckner, A., & Franke, N. (2021). Salience effects in information acquisition: No evidence for a top-down coherence influence. Memory & Cognition, 49, 1537-1554. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-021-01188-9 [data and materials on OSF]

• Crusius, J., & Lange, J. (2021). Counterfactual thoughts distinguish benign and malicious envy. Emotion, 21(5), 905-920. https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0000923 [data and materials on OSF]   

• Crusius, J., Thierhoff, J., & Lange, J. (2021). Dispositional greed predicts benign and malicious envy. Personality and Individual Differences, 168, 110361. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2020.110361 [preprint] [data and materials on OSF]

• Eriksson, K., Strimling, P., Gelfand, M., Wu, J., Abernathy, J., Akotia, C. S.,… Dorrough, A. R., Glöckner, A.,… Van Lange, P. A. M. (2021). Perceptions of the appropriate response to norm violation in 57 societies. Nature Communications, 12, Article 1481. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-21602-9 [data and materials on OSF]

• Fiedler, S., Glöckner, A., & Hellmann, M. (2021). Altruistic giving towards refugees: Identifying factors that increase citizens’ willingness to help. Frontiers in Psychology, 12(3127). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.689184

• Fleischmann, A., Lammers, J., Conway, P., & Galinsky, A. D. (2021). Kant be compared: People high in social comparison orientation make fewer—not more—deontological decisions in sacrificial dilemmas. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 12(6), 984-995. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550620947294 [data and materials on OSF]

• Froehlich, L., Dorrough, A. R., Glöckner, A. & Stürmer, S. (2021). Similarity predicts cross-national social preferences. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 12(8), 1486-1498. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550620982704 [data and materials on OSF]

• Genschow, O., Westfal, M., Crusius, J., Bartosch, L., Feikes, K. I., Pallasch, N., & Wozniak, M. (2021). Does social psychology persist over half a century? A direct replication of Cialdini et al.’s (1975) classic door-in-the-face technique. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 120(2), e1–e7. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspa0000261 [preprint] [data and materials on OSF]

• Glöckner, A. (2021). Prospect theory. In M. Knauff & W. Spohn (Eds.), The Handbook of Rationality (pp. 485-493). MIT Press. [full text]

• Greenwald, A. G., Brendl, M., Cai, H., Cvencek, D., Dovidio, J. F., Friese, M., ... & Wiers, R. W. (2021). Best research practices for using the Implicit Association Test. Behavior research methods, 1-20. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-021-01624-3

• Hellmann, D. M., Dorrough, A. R., & Glöckner, A. (2021). Prosocial behavior during the COVID-19 pandemic in Germany. The role of responsibility and vulnerability. Heliyon, 7(9), Article e08041. [data and materials on OSF] https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e08041

• Liu, S., Zhang, R.Y., & Kishimoto, T. (2021). Analysis and prospect of clinical psychology based on topic models: hot research topics and scientific trends in the latest decades. Psychology, Health & Medicine, 26(4), 395-407. https://doi.org/10.1080/13548506.2020.1738019

• Michels, M., Glöckner, A., & Giersch, D. (2021). Personality psychology in times of crisis: profile-specific recommendations on how to deal with COVID-19. Personality and Individual Differences, 174, 110676. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2021.110676 [data and materials on OSF]

• Mischkowski, D. (2021). Schau, ich lasse dir die Wahl! – Sozial achtsames Verhalten als Zeichen für Prosozialität und Perspektivübernahme im Alltag. In-Mind Magazin, 4/2021.

• Mischkowski, D., Glöckner, A., & Lewisch, P. (2021). Information search, coherence effects, and their interplay in legal decision making. Journal of Economic Psychology, 87, 102445. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2021.102445 [data and materials on OSF]

• Olsson, M. I. T, Froehlich, L., Dorrough, A. R., & Martiny, S. E. (2021). The hers and his of prosociality across 10 countries. British Journal of Social Psychology, 60(4), 1330-1349. http://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12454 [data and materials on OSF]

• Schäfer, S. J., Simsek, M., Jaspers, E., Kros, M., Hewstone, M., Schmid, K., Fell, B. F., Dorrough, A. R., Glöckner, A., & Christ. O. (2021). Dynamic contact effects: Individuals’ positive and negative contact history influences intergroup contact effects in a behavioral game. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000374

• Weiss, A., Dorrough, A. R., & Schmitz*, L. (2021). Analytic atheism in a low-religiosity culture: Examining the relationship between analytic thinking and religious belief in Germany. Personality and Individual Differences, 178, Article 110854. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2021.110854 [data and materials on OSF] *The 3rd author was a student under the supervision of the second author.

2020

• Betsch, T., Aßmann, L., & Glöckner, A. (2020). Paranormal Beliefs and Individual Differences: Story Seeking without Reasoned Review. Heliyon, 6, e04259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04259 [data and materials on OSF]

• Crusius*, J., Gonzalez*, M. F., Lange*, J., & Cohen-Charash*, Y. (2020). Envy: An adversarial review and comparison of two competing views. Emotion Review, 12, 3-21. https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073919873131 [preprint] *equal contribution

• Dorrough, A. R., & Glöckner, A. (2020). Sex differences concerning prosocial behavior in social dilemmas are (partially) mediated by risk preferences but not social preferences. An in-depth analysis across 10 countries. Social Psychology, 52(2), 61-74. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000434 [data and materials on OSF]

• Dorrough, A. R., Olsson, M. I. T., Froehlich, L., Glöckner, A., & Martiny, S. E. (2020). Does she compensate the victim while he punishes the perpetrator? No gender differences in anonymous economic games across 11 nations. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 34(2), 261-274. https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.2208 [data and materials on OSF]

• Engel, C., Timme, S., & Glöckner, A. (2020). Coherence-based reasoning and order effects in legal judgments. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 26, 333-352. https://doi.org/10.1037/law0000257

• Fischer, I., Avrashi, S., Oz, T., Fadul, R., Gutman, K., Rubenstein, D., ... & Glöckner, A. (2020). The behavioural challenge of the COVID-19 pandemic: indirect measurements and personalized attitude changing treatments (IMPACT). Royal Society open science, 7(8), 201131. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.201131

• Fleischmann, A., & Burgmer, P. (2020). Abstract thinking increases support for affirmative action. Sex Roles, 82(7), 493-511. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-019-01068-2

• Fleischmann, A., & Lammers, J. (2020). Power and moral thinking. Current opinion in psychology, 33, 23-27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2019.06.008 

• Froehlich, L., Olsson, M. I. T., Dorrough, A. R., & Martiny, S. E. (2020). Gender at work across nations: Men and women working in male‐dominated and female‐dominated occupations are differentially associated with agency and communion. Journal of Social Issues, 76(3), 484-511. https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12390 [data and materials on OSF]

• Glöckner, A. (2020). Legitimität und Rechtsbefolgung: Eine empirisch-psychologische Perspektive. In T. Herbst & S. Zucca-Soest (Eds.), Legitimität des Staates (pp.47-64). Baden-Baden: Nomos. https://doi.org/10.5771/9783748902638    

• Glöckner, A., Renerte, B., & Schmidt, U. (2020). Violations of coalescing in parametric utility measurement. Theory and Decision, 89, 471-501. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11238-020-09761-5

• Goedderz, A. & Hahn, A. (2020). Haben wir alle versteckte Vorurteile? Implizite Einstellungen und ihre Bedeutung in der Gesellschaft [Do we all have hidden prejudices? Implicit attitudes and their relevance in society]. In-Mind Magazin, 1/2020.

• Hahn, A., & Goedderz, A. (2020). Trait-unconsciousness, state-unconsciousness, preconsciousness, and social miscalibration in the context of implicit evaluation. Social Cognition, 38(Supplement), 115-134. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2020.38.supp.s115

• Jekel, M., Fiedler, S., Allstadt Torras, R., Mischkowski, D., Dorrough, A. R., & Glöckner, A. (2020). How to teach open science principles in the undergraduate curriculum — the Hagen Cumulative Science Project. Psychology Learning & Teaching, 19(1), 91-106. https://doi.org/10.1177/1475725719868149

• Koch, A., Dorrough, A., Glöckner, A., & Imhoff, R. (2020). The ABC of society: Perceived similarity in agency/socioeconomic success and conservative-progressive beliefs increases intergroup cooperation. Journal of experimental social psychology, 90, 103996. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2020.103996 [data and materials on OSF]

• König, L. M., & Crusius, J. (2020). Die Wissenschaftskommunikation braucht einen Ehrenkodex [Science communication needs an honor code]. wissenschaftskommunikation.de.

• Kranz, D. & Goedderz, A. (2020). Coming home from a stay abroad: Associations between young people’s reentry problems and their cultural identity formation. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 74, 115-126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2019.11.003

• Lammers, J., Crusius, J., & Gast, A. (2020). Correcting misperceptions of exponential coronavirus growth increases support for social distancing. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(28), 16264-16266. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2006048117 [data on OSF]

• Nett, T., Dorrough, A. R., Jekel, M., & Glöckner, A. (2020). Perceived biological and social characteristics of a representative set of German first names. Social Psychology, 51(1), 17-34. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000383  [data and materials on OSF]

• Phills, C. E., Hahn, A., & Gawronski, B. (2020). The bidirectional causal relation between implicit stereotypes and implicit prejudice. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 46(9), 1318-1330. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167219899234 [osf] 

• Wulff, L., & Scharf, S. E. (2020). Unpacking stereotype influences on source-monitoring processes: What mouse tracking can tell us. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 87, 10391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2019.103917

2019

• Bai, Q., Liu, S., & Kishimoto, T. (2019). School incivility and academic burnout: the mediating role of perceived peer support and the moderating role of future academic self-salience. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 3016. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.03016

• Corcoran, K., & Crusius, J. (2019). Das tut weh, aber motiviert auch. Neid an der Universität. Forschung & Lehre, 26, 836-837.

• Dorrough, A. R., & Glöckner, A. (2019). A cross-national analysis of sex differences in prisoner's dilemma games. British Journal of Social Psychology, 58 (1), 225-240. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12287 [data and materials on OSF]

• Dorrough, A. R., Nater, C., & Leszczyńska, M. (2019). Die Frauenquote greift in mehreren europäischen Ländern: Was sind die positiven und negativen Nebenwirkungen? In-Mind Magazin, 1/2019.

• Fleischmann, A., & Gast, A. (2019). Editorial Gender Special Issue: Männer können nicht zuhören, Frauen können nicht einparken? Psychologische Forschung zu Geschlechterunterschieden und -stereotypen [Men don’t listen, women cannot park? Psychological research about gender differences and stereotypes]. In-Mind Magazin, 1/2019.

• Fleischmann, A., Lammers, J., Conway, P., & Galinsky, A. D. (2019). Paradoxical effects of power on moral thinking: Why power both increases and decreases deontological and utilitarian moral decisions. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 10, 110-120. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550617744022  [data and materials on OSF]

• Fleischmann, A., Lammers, J., Stoker, J. I., & Garretsen, H. (2019). You can leave your glasses on: Glasses can increase electoral success. Social Psychology, 50, 38-52. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000359  [data and materials on OSF]

• Gawronski, B., & Hahn, A. (2019). Implicit measures: Procedures, use, and interpretation. In H. Blanton, J. M. LaCroix, & G. D. Webster (Eds.), Measurement in social psychology (pp. 29-55). New York, NY: Taylor & Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429452925-2

• Glöckner, A. (2019). Der Mensch im Spannungsfeld zwischen (begrenzter) Rationalität, Eigeninteresse und Kooperation: Welches Wesen adressiert das Recht? In A. Funke & U. Schmalke (Eds.), Menschenbilder im Recht (pp. 79-91).Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.https://doi.org/10.1628/978-3-16-157698-0

• Glöckner, A., & Jekel, M. (2019). Testing cognitive models by a joint analysis of multiple dependent measures. In M. Schulte-Mecklenbeck et al. (Eds.), Handbook of Process Tracing (2nd Edition) (pp. 356-373). New York: Routledge.

• Hahn, A., & Gawronski, B. (2019). Facing one's implicit biases: From awareness to acknowledgement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 116, 769-794. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000155 [supp] [osf]

• Jekel, M. (2019). Empirical content as a criterion for evaluating models. Cognitive Processing, 20(2), 273-275. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-019-00913-2

• Kannegießer, A., Orth, C., Posten, A.-C., & Hoese, M. (2019). Neue Föderative Gutachtenstandards - Die Quadratur des Kreises? Praxis der Rechtspsychologie, 29, 147-151.

• Lange, J., Redford, L., & Crusius, J. (2019). A status-seeking account of psychological entitlement. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 45(7), 1113-1128.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167218808501  [data and materials on OSF]

• Mischkowski, D., Stone, R., & Stremitzer, A. (2019). Promises, expectations, and social cooperation. The Journal of Law and Economics, 62(4), 687-712. https://doi.org/10.1086/706075

• Mischkowski, D., Thielmann, I., & Glöckner, A. (2019). Minimizing inequality versus maximizing joint gains: On the relation between personality traits and different prosocial motivations. Journal of Research in Personality, 81, 153-157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2019.06.001  [data and materials on OSF]

• Posten, A.-C., & Kitzig, C. (2019). Strategische Merkmalsnutzung zur Erkennung und Tarnung von Lügen aus der Perspektive von Laien [Strategic cue application to detect and disguise lies from lay people’s perspective]. Praxis der Rechtspsychologie. [pdf]

• Posten, A.-C., & Mussweiler, T. (2019). Egocentric foundations of trust. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 84, 103820. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2019.103820

• Posten, A.-C., & Mussweiler, T. (2019). How do you decide whether to trust a stranger? Character & Context.

• Posten, A-.C., Bliesener, T., Dahle, K.-P., & Orth, C. (2019). Zur Expertise forensischer Sachverständiger - Ein Positionspapier [On the expertise of forensic expert witnesses - A position paper]. Psychologische Rundschau, 70, 259-260. https://doi.org/10.1026/0033-3042/a000458

• Rivers, A. M., & Hahn, A. (2019). What cognitive mechanisms do people reflect on when they predict IAT scores? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 45, 878-892.https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167218799307  [osf]

• Waubert de Puiseau, B., Glöckner, A., & Towfigh, E. V. (2019). Integrating theories of law obedience: How utility-theoretic factors, legitimacy, and lack of self-control influence decisions to commit low-level crimes. Judgment and Decision Making, 14, 318-334.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S1930297500004368  [data and materials on OSF]

2018

• Betsch, T., Lehmann, A., Jekel, M., Lindow, S., & Glöckner, A. (2018). Children’s application of decision strategies in a compensatory environment. Judgment and Decision Making, 13(6), 514-528. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1930297500006562 [data]

• Fiedler, S., Hellmann, D. M., Dorrough, A. R., & Glöckner, A. (2018). Cross-national in-group favoritism in prosocial behavior: Evidence from Latin and North America. Judgment and Decision Making, 13(1), 42-60. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1930297500008810   [data and materials on OSF]

• Glöckner, A., Fiedler, S., & Renkewitz, F. (2018). Belastbare und effiziente Wissenschaft: Strategische Ausrichtung von Forschungsprozessen als Weg aus der Replikationskrise. Psychologische Rundschau, 69, 22-36. https://doi.org/10.1026/0033-3042/a000384

• Glöckner, A., Kube, S., & Nicklisch, A. (2018). The joint benefits of observed and unobserved social sanctions. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, 75, 105-116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2018.05.007  [data and materials on OSF]

• Hahn, A., & Gawronski, B. (2018). Implicit social cognition. In J. T. Wixted (Ed.), The Stevens’ handbook of experimental psychology and cognitive neuroscience (4th ed., Vol. 4, pp. 395-427). New York, NY: Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119170174.epcn412

• Jekel, M., & Glöckner, A. (2018). How to identify strategy use and adaptive strategy selection: The crucial role of chance correction in weighted compensatory strategies. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 31, 265-279. https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.1983

• Jekel, M., & Glöckner, A. (2018). Meaningful model comparisons have to include reasonable competing models and also all data: A rejoinder to Rieskamp (2018). Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 31, 289-293. https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.2076

• Jekel, M., Glöckner, A., & Bröder, A. (2018). A new and unique prediction for cue-search in a parallel-constraint satisfaction network model: The attraction search effect. Psychological Review, 125, 744-768. https://doi.org/10.1037/rev0000107  [data and materials on OSF]

• Lammers, J., & Baldwin, M. (2018). Past-focused temporal communication overcomes conservatives' resistance to liberal political ideas. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 114(4), 599-619. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000121  [data on OSF]

• Lammers, J., Gast, A., Unkelbach, C., & Galinsky, A. D. (2018). Moral character impression formation depends on the valence homogeneity of the context. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 9(5), 576-585. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550617714585  [data on OSF]

• Lange, J., Blatz, L., & Crusius, J. (2018). Dispositional envy: A conceptual review. In V. Zeigler-Hill & T. K. Shackelford (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of personality and individual differences. Volume III: Applications of personality and individual differences (pp. 424-439). London, UK: SAGE. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781526451248  [pdf]

• Lange, J., Paulhus, D. L., & Crusius, J. (2018). Elucidating the dark side of envy: Distinctive links of benign and malicious envy with dark personalities. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 44(4), 601-614. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167217746340 [data and materials on OSF]

• Lange, J., Weidman, A. C., & Crusius, J. (2018). The painful duality of envy: Evidence for an integrative theory and a meta-analysis on the relation of envy and schadenfreude. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 114(4), 572-598. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000118 [data and materials on OSF]

• Marewski, J. N., Bröder, A., & Glöckner, A. (2018). Some metatheoretical reflections on adaptive decision making and the strategy selection problem. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 31(2), 181-198. https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.2075

• McCarthy, R. J., Skowronski, J. J., Verschuere, B., Meijer, E. H., Jim, A., Hoogesteyn, K., ... & Yıldız, E. (2018). Registered replication report on Srull and Wyer (1979). Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(3), 321-336. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918777487 [data and materials on OSF]

• Mischkowski, D., Glöckner, A., & Lewisch, P. (2018). From spontaneous cooperation to spontaneous punishment – Distinguishing the underlying motives driving spontaneous behavior in first and second order public good games. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 149, 59-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2018.07.001 [data and materials on OSF]

• Mischkowski, D., Thielmann, I., & Glöckner, A. (2018). Think it through before making a choice? Processing mode does not influence social mindfulness. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 74, 85-97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2017.09.001 [data and materials on OSF]

• Posten, A.-C., & Steinmetz, J. (2018). Temperatur und Zustimmung - ein bisher unbekannter Zusammenhang. Einblicke für Praxis und Forschung. Praxis der Rechtspsychologie, 2, 137-152. [pdf]

• Steinmetz, J., & Posten, A.-C. (2018). White lies and black lies: What they have in common and how they differ. In-Mind Magazine. [full text]

• Stürmer, S., Christ, O., Jonkmann, K., Josephs, I., Gaschler, R., Glöckner, A., … Salewski, C. (2018). 10 Jahre universitäres Fernstudium in Psychologie an der FernUniversität in Hagen. Psychologische Rundschau, 69, 104-108. https://doi.org/10.1026/0033-3042/a000400

• Towfigh, E. V., Traxler, C., & Glöckner, A. (2018). Geschlechts- und Herkunftseffekte bei der Benotung juristischer Staatsprüfungen. Zeitschrift Für Didaktik Der Rechtswissenschaft, 5, 115-142. https://doi.org/10.5771/2196-7261-2018-2-115

• Verschuere, B., Meijer, E. H., Jim, A., Hoogesteyn, K., Orthey, R., McCarthy, R. J., … Blatz, L., … Crusius, J., … Yıldız, E (2018). Registered Replication Report on Mazar, Amir, and Ariely (2008). Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1, 299-317. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918781032 [data and materials on OSF]

2017

• Amit, E., Koralnik, J., Posten, A.-C., Muethel, M., & Lessig, L. (2017). Institutional corruption revisited: Exploring open questions within the institutional corruption literature. Southern California Interdisciplinary Law Journal, 26, 447-595. [pdf]

• Bassarak, C., Leib, M., Mischkowski, D., Strang, S., Glöckner, A., & Shalvi, S. (2017). What provides justification for cheating—producing or observing counterfactuals? Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 30, 964-975. https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.2013  [data and materials on OSF]

• Bouwmeester, S., Verkoeijen, P. P. J. L., Aczel, B., Barbosa, F., Bègue, L., Brañas-Garza, P., … Glöckner, A., … Mischkowski, D., … Wollbrant, C. E. (2017). Registered Replication Report: Rand, Greene, and Nowak (2012). Perspectives on Psychological Science, 12, 527-542. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691617693624  [data and materials on OSF]

• Crusius*, J., & Lange*, J. (2017). How do people respond to threatened social status? Moderators of benign versus malicious envy. In R. H. Smith, U. Merlone, & M. K. Duffy (Eds.), Envy at work and in organizations (pp. 85-110). New York, NY: Oxford University Press. [pdf] *shared first authorship

• Dohrenbusch, R., & Allstadt Torras, R. (2017). Prinzipien und Methoden der Beschwerdenvalidierung. PSYCH up2date, 11(04), 359-374. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-122885

• Dorrough, A. R. (2017). The Determinants of Intergroup Social Dilemma Behavior a Special Focus on Cross National Interactions. Doctoral Thesis published at Göttingen State and University Library.

• Dorrough, A. R., Glöckner & A. Lee, B. (2017). Race for power in public good games with unequal, unstable punishment power. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 30, 582-609. https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.1976  [data and materials on OSF]

• Dorrough, A. R., Glöckner, A., Betsch, T., & Wille, A. (2017). When knowledge activated from memory intrudes into decisions from description—The case of stereotypes. Acta Psychologica, 180, 64-78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2017.08.006  [data and materials on OSF]

• Guinote, A., & Lammers, J. (2017). Accentuation of tending and befriending among the powerless. In M. Bukowski, I. Fritsche, A. Guinote, & M. Kofta (Eds.), Coping with lack of control in a social world (pp. 185-202). New York, NY: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315661452-19   

• Koscholke, J., & Jekel, M. (2017). Probabilistic coherence measures: a psychological study of coherence assessment. Synthese, 194, 1303-1322. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-015-0996-6

• Lammers, J., & Burgmer, P. (2017). Power increases anchoring effects on judgment. Social Cognition, 35(1), 40-53. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2017.35.1.40  [data on OSF]

• Lammers, J., & Gast, A. (2017). Stressing the advantages of female leadership can place women at a disadvantage. Social Psychology, 48, 28-39. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000292  [data on OSF]

• Lammers, J., Dubois, D., Rucker, D. D., & Galinsky, A. D. (2017). Ease of retrieval moderates the effects of power: Implications for the replicability of power recall effects. Social Cognition, 35(1), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2017.35.1.1  [data on OSF]

• Lammers, J., Koch, A., Conway, P., & Brandt, M. J. (2017). The political domain appears simpler to the politically extreme than to political moderates. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 8(6), 612-622. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550616678456  [data on OSF]

• Leach, S., Weick, M., & Lammers, J. (2017). Does influence beget autonomy? Clarifying the relationship between social and personal power. Journal of Theoretical Social Psychology, 1(1), 5-14. https://doi.org/10.1002/jts5.5

• Meijs, M. H. J., Ratliff, K. A., & Lammers, J. (2017). The discrepancy between how women see themselves and feminists predicts identification with feminism. Sex Roles, 77, 293-308. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-016-0733-8

• Posten, A.-C., & Mussweiler, T. (2017). That certain something! Focusing on similarities reduces judgmental uncertainty. Cognition, 165, 121-125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2017.05.010

• Steinmetz*, J., & Posten*, A.-C. (2017). Physical temperature affects response behavior. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 70, 294-300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2016.12.001 *shared first authorship

2016

• Appel, H., Gerlach, A. L., & Crusius, J. (2016). The interplay between Facebook use, social comparison, envy, and depression. Current Opinion in Psychology, 9, 44-49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2015.10.006  [pdf]

• Ashby, N. J. S., Jekel, M., Dickert, S., & Glöckner, A. (2016). Finding the right fit: A comparison of process assumptions underlying popular drift-diffusion models. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 42, 1982-1993. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000279

• Baldwin, M., & Lammers, J. (2016). Past-focused environmental comparisons promote proenvironmental outcomes for conservatives. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113, 14953-14957. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1610834113

• Corcoran, K., & Crusius, J. (2016). Sozialer Vergleich [Social comparison]. In D. Frey & H.-W. Bierhoff (Eds.), Sozialpsychologie - Soziale Motive und Soziale Einstellungen [Social psychology—Social motives and social attitudes], Enzyklopädie der Psychologie (Vol. C/VI/2, pp. 87-106). Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe.  [pdf]

• Dorrough*, A. R., Leszczyńska*, M., Barreto, M., & Glöckner, A. (2016). Revealing side effects of quota rules on group cooperation. Journal of Economic Psychology, 57, 136-152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2016.09.007 * shared first authorship  [data and materials on OSF]

• Dorrough, A. R., & Glöckner, A. (2016). Multinational investigation of cross-societal cooperation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113(39), 10836-10841. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1601294113  [data on OSF]

• Fleischmann, A., Sieverding, M., Hespenheide, U., Weiß, M., & Koch, S. C. (2016). See feminine – Think incompetent? The effects of a feminine outfit on the evaluation of women’s computer competence. Computers & Education, 95, 63-74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.12.007

• Glöckner, A. (2016). Psychology and disaster: Why we do not see looming disasters and how our way of thinking causes them. Global Policy, 7, 16-24. https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.12289

• Glöckner, A., Hilbig, B. E., Henninger, F., & Fiedler, S. (2016). The reversed description-experience gap: Disentangling sources of presentation format effects in risky choice. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 145, 486-508. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0040103  [data and materials on OSF]

• Glöckner, A. (2016). The irrational hungry judge effect revisited: Simulations reveal that the magnitude of the effect is overestimated. Judgment and Decision Making, 11, 601-610.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S1930297500004812   

• Glöckner, A., & Towfigh, E. V. (2016). Messgenauigkeit und Fairness in Staatsprüfungen: Aktuelle Studien zeigen Gruppen-Unterschiede in juristischen Examina auf. Anwaltsblatt, 10, 706-709.

• Hochman, G., Glöckner, A., Fiedler, S., & Ayal, S. (2016). “I can see it in your eyes”: Biased processing and increased arousal in dishonest responses. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 29, 322-335. https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.1932  [data and materials on OSF]

• Lammers, J., & Imhoff, R. (2016). Power and sadomasochism: Understanding the antecedents of a knotty relationship. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 7, 142-148. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550615604452

• Lammers, J., & Maner, J. (2016). Power and attraction to the counternormative aspects of infidelity. The Journal of Sex Research, 53, 54-63. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2014.989483

• Lammers, J., Stoker, J. I., Rink, F., & Galinsky, A. D. (2016). To have control over or to be free from others? The desire for power reflects a need for autonomy. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 42, 498-512. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167216634064  [data on OSF]

• Lange*, J., Crusius*, J., & Hagemeyer, B. (2016). The Evil Queen's dilemma: Linking narcissistic admiration and rivalry to benign and malicious envy. European Journal of Personality, 30, 168-188. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.2047  [pdf]  [supplement]  [data and materials on OSF]  *shared first authorship

• Mischkowski, D., & Glöckner, A. (2016). Spontaneous cooperation for prosocials, but not for proselfs: Social value orientation moderates spontaneous cooperation behavior. Scientific Reports, 6, 21555. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep21555  [data and materials on OSF]

• Schweinsberg, M., Madan, N., Vianello, M., Sommer, S. A., Jordan, J., Tierney, W., ... Hahn, A., ... Uhlmann, E. L. (2016). The pipeline project: Pre-publication independent replications of a single laboratory’s research pipeline. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 66, 55-67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2015.10.001

• Seithe, M., Morina, J., & Glöckner, A. (2016). Bonn eXperimental System (BoXS): An open-source platform for interactive experiments in psychology and economics. Behavior Research Methods, 48, 1454-1475. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-015-0660-6

• Tierney, W., Schweinsberg, M., Jordan, J., Kennedy, D. M., Qureshi, I., Sommer, S. A., ... Hahn, A. ... Uhlmann, E. L. (2016). Data from a pre-publication independent replication initiative examining ten moral judgement effects. Scientific Data, 3, 160082. https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2016.82

• Towfigh, E. V., Goerg, S. J., Glöckner, A., Leifeld, P., Llorente-Saguer, A., Bade, S., & Kurschilgen, C. (2016). Do direct-democratic procedures lead to higher acceptance than political representation? Experimental survey evidence from Germany. Public Choice, 167, 47-65. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-016-0330-y

2015

• Appel, H., Crusius, J., & Gerlach, A. (2015). Social comparison, envy, and depression on Facebook: A study looking at the effects of high comparison standards on depressed individuals. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 34, 277-289. https://doi.org/10.1521/jscp.2015.34.4.277  [pdf]

• Ashby, N. J. S., Walasek, L., & Glöckner, A. (2015). The effect of consumer ratings and attentional allocation on product valuations. Judgment and Decision Making, 10, 172-184. . https://doi.org/10.1017/S1930297500003934  [data and materials]

• Crusius, J., & Lange, J. (2015). Envy. In M. Altman (Ed.), Real world decision making: An encyclopaedia of behavioral economics (pp. 122-123). Santa Barbara, CA: Greenwood. [pdf]

• De Waal-Andrews, W., Gregg, A. P., & Lammers, J. (2015). When status is grabbed and when status is granted: Getting ahead in dominance and prestige hierarchies. British Journal of Social Psychology, 54, 445-464. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12093

• Dorrough, A. R., Glöckner, A., Hellmann, D. M., & Ebert, I. (2015). The development of ingroup favoritism in repeated social dilemmas. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, Article 476. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00476  [data and materials on OSF]

• Feeser, M., Fan, Y., Weigand, A., Hahn, A., Gärtner, M., Böker, H., Grimm, S., & Bajbouj, M. (2015). Oxytocin improves mentalizing – Pronounced effects for individuals with attenuated ability to empathize. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 53, 223-232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psyneuen.2014.12.015

• Fiedler, S., & Glöckner, A. (2015). Attention and moral behavior. Current Opinion in Psychology, 6, 139-144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2015.08.008

• Fleischmann, A., & Sieverding, M. (2015). Reactions toward men who have taken parental leave: Does the length of parental leave matter? Sex Roles, 72, 462-476. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-015-0469-x

• Glöckner, A., & Englich, B. (2015). When relevance matters. Social Psychology, 46, 4-12. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000214

• Glöckner, A., Tontrup, S., & Bechtold, S. (2015). Disentangling psychological sources of overpricing in anticommons dilemmas: Strategic incentives, endowment effects, and interdependence of outcomes. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 28, 224-238. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bdm.1839  [data and materials on OSF]

• Glöckner, A., & Towfigh, E. V. (2015). Entscheidungen zwischen „Intuition“ und „Rationalität“. Deutsche Richterzeitung, 7/8, 14-17. [pdf]

• Hachfeld, A., Hahn, A., Schroeder, S., Anders, Y., & Kunter, M. (2015). Should teachers be colorblind? How multicultural and colorblind beliefs differentially relate to aspects of teachers’ professional competence for teaching in diverse classrooms. Teaching and Teacher Education, 48, 44-55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2015.02.001

• Hahn, A., Banchefsky, S., Park, B., & Judd, C. M. (2015). Measuring intergroup ideologies: Positive and negative aspects of emphasizing versus looking beyond group differences. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 41, 1646-1664. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167215607351

• Hahn, A., & Gawronski, B. (2015). Implicit social cognition. In J. D. Wright (Ed.), International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.) (pp. 714-720). Oxford, UK: Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.24066-X  [invited submission]

• Inbar, Y., & Lammers, J. (2015). Increasing ideological tolerance in social psychology [Peer commentary on “Political diversity will improve social psychological science” by J. L. Duarte et al.]. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 38, e147. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X1400123X

• Lammers, J., Galinsky, A. D., Dubois, D., & Rucker, D. D. (2015). Power and morality. Current Opinion in Psychology, 6, 15-19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2015.03.018

• Lange, J., & Crusius, J. (2015). Dispositional envy revisited: Unraveling the motivational dynamics of benign and malicious envy. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 41, 284-294. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167214564959  [pdf]  [open data and materials]

• Lange, J., & Crusius, J. (2015). The tango of two deadly sins: The social-functional relation of envy and pride. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 109, 453-472. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000026  [pdf]  [open data and materials]

• Meijs, M. H. J., Lammers, J., & Ratliff, K. A. (2015). Gender stereotype-inconsistent acts are seen as more acceptable than stereotype-consistent acts, if they are clever. Social Psychology, 46, 291-305. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000244  [data and materials on OSF]

• Miller, J. E., Amit, E., & Posten, A.-C. (2015). Behavioral economics. In H. ten Have (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Global Bioethics (pp. 1-6). Cham, Switzerland: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05544-2_37-1

• Morell, A., Glöckner, A., & Towfigh, E. V. (2015). Sticky rebates: Loyalty rebates impede rational switching of consumers. Journal of Competition Law & Economics, 11, 431-461. https://doi.org/10.1093/joclec/nhv009

• Open Science Collaboration (2015). Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science. Science, 349(6251), aac4716. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aac4716  [data and materials on OSF]

2014

• Corcoran, K., & Crusius, J. (2014). Warum sozialpsychologische Forschung für die Rechtswissenschaften von Interesse ist [Why social psychological research is of interest for law]. Austrian Law Journal, 1, 40-47.  [pdf]

• Crusius, J., & Lange, J. (2014). What catches the envious eye? How malicious and benign envy bias attention. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 55, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2014.05.007  [pdf]

• Engel, C., Beckenkamp, M., Glöckner, A., Irlenbusch, B., Hennig-Schmidt, H., Kube, S., … Towfigh, E. (2014). First impressions are more important than early intervention: Qualifying Broken Windows Theory in the lab. International Review of Law and Economics, 37, 126-136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irle.2013.07.005

• Feeser, M., Fan, Y., Weigand, A., Hahn, A., Gärtner, M., Aust, S., Böker, H., Bajbouj, M., & Grimm, S. (2014). The beneficial effect of oxytocin on avoidance-related facial emotion recognition depends on early life stress experience. Psychopharmacology, 231, 4735-4744. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00213-014-3631-1

• Glöckner, A., & Bröder, A. (2014). Cognitive integration of recognition information and additional cues in memory-based decisions. Judgment and Decision Making, 9, 35-50. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1930297500004964  [data]

• Glöckner, A., Hilbig, B. E., & Jekel, M. (2014). What is adaptive about adaptive decision making? A parallel constraint satisfaction account. Cognition, 133, 641-666. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2014.08.017  [data and materials on OSF]

• Hahn, A., & Gawronski, B. (2014). Do implicit evaluations reflect unconscious attitudes? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 37, 28-29. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X13000721

• Hahn, A., Judd, C. M., Hirsh, H. K., & Blair, I. V. (2014). Awareness of implicit attitudes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143, 1369-1392. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035028

• Hahn, A., Nunes, A., Park, B., & Judd, C. M. (2014). Social-psychological recommendations for a diverse work environment. In K. M. Thomas, V. C. Plaut, & M. Tran (Eds.), Diversity ideologies in organizations (pp. 236-252). New York, NY: Taylor & Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315852188

• Hilbig, B. E., Glöckner, A., & Zettler, I. (2014). Personality and prosocial behavior: Linking basic traits and social value orientations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 107, 529-539. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036074

• Inbar, Y., & Lammers, J. (2014). Political diversity in social psychology: Problems and solutions. In P. Valdesolo & J. Graham (Eds.), Bridging ideological divides, Claremont symposium on applied social psychology. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315644387-10 

• Jekel, M., Glöckner, A., Bröder, A., & Maydych, V. (2014). Approximating rationality under incomplete information: Adaptive inferences for missing cue values based on cue-discrimination. Judgment and Decision Making, 9, 129-147. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1930297500005490 [data and materials]

• Lammers, J., & Van Beest, I. (2014). The effects of power on immorality. In J.-W. Van Prooijen & P. A. M. Van Lange (Eds.), Power, politics, and paranoia: Why people are suspicious of their leaders (pp. 17-32). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139565417.004

• Open Science Collaboration. (2014).  The reproducibility project: A model of large-scale collaboration for empirical research on reproducibility. In V. Stodden, F. Leisch, & R. D. Peng (Eds.), Implementing reproducible computational research (pp. 299-324). New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.

• Posten, A.-C., Ockenfels, A., & Mussweiler, T. (2014). How activating cognitive content shapes trust: A subliminal priming study. Journal of Economic Psychology, 41, 12-19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2013.04.002

• Söllner, A., Bröder, A., Glöckner, A., & Betsch, T. (2014). Single-process versus multiple-strategy models of decision making: Evidence from an information intrusion paradigm. Acta Psychologica, 146, 84-96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2013.12.007

• Towfigh, E. V., Traxler, C., & Glöckner, A. (2014). Zur Benotung in der Examensvorbereitung und im ersten Examen: eine empirische Analyse. Zeitschrift für Didaktik der Rechtswissenschaft, 1, 8-27. [pdf]

2013

• Bröder, A., Glöckner, A., Betsch, T., Link, D., & Ettlin, F. (2013). Do people learn option or strategy routines in multi-attribute decisions? The answer depends on subtle factors. Acta Psychologica, 143, 200-209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2013.03.005

• Çelik, P., Lammers, J., van Beest, I., Bekker, M. H. J., & Vonk, R. (2013). Not all rejections are alike: Competence and warmth as a fundamental distinction in social rejection. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49, 635-642. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2013.02.010

• Çelik, P., van Beest, I., Lammers, J., & Bekker, M. (2013). Implicit threat vigilance among violent offenders diagnosed with antisocial personality disorder: The impact of ostracism and control threat. International Journal of Developmental Science, 7, 47-55. https://doi.org/10.3233/DEV-1312116

• Crusius, J., & Mussweiler, T. (2013). Untangling envy. The feeling can help us even when it hurts. Scientific American Mind, 24, 35-37.  [pdf]

• Engel, C., & Glöckner, A. (2013). Role-induced bias in court: An experimental analysis. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 26, 272-284. https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.1761

• Fiedler, S., Glöckner, A., Nicklisch, A., & Dickert, S. (2013). Social Value Orientation and information search in social dilemmas: An eye-tracking analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 120, 272-284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2012.07.002

• Glöckner, A., & Engel, C. (2013). Can we trust intuitive jurors? Standards of proof and the probative value of evidence in coherence-based reasoning. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 10, 230-252. https://doi.org/10.1111/jels.12009

• Glöckner, A., Towfigh, E., & Traxler, C. (2013). Development of legal expertise. Instructional Science, 41, 989-1007. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-013-9266-5

• Lammers, J., & Proulx, T. (2013). Writing autobiographical narratives increases political conservatism. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49, 684-691. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2013.03.008

• Lammers, J., Dubois, D., Rucker, D. D., & Galinsky, A. D. (2013). Power gets the job: Priming power improves interview outcomes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49, 776-779. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2013.02.008

• Latu, I. M., Mast, M. S., Lammers, J., & Bombari, D. (2013). Successful female leaders empower women’s behavior in leadership tasks. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49, 444-448. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2013.01.003

• Posten, A.-C., & Mussweiler, T. (2013). When distrust frees your mind: The stereotype-reducing effects of distrust. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 105, 567-584. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0033170

• Towfigh, E. V., Glöckner, A., & Reid, R. (2013). Dangerous games: The psychological case for regulating gambling. Charleston Law Review, 8, 148-189. [pdf]

2012

• Ashby, N. J. S., Dickert, S., & Glöckner, A. (2012). Focusing on what you own: Biased information uptake due to ownership. Judgment and Decision Making, 7, 254-267. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1930297500002230  [data]

• Crusius, J., & Mussweiler, T. (2012). Des einen Freud, des anderen ... Gehirn&Geist, 10, 18-23.  [pdf]

• Crusius, J., & Mussweiler, T. (2012). Social comparison in negotiation. In G. E. Bolton & R. T. A. Croson (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of economic conflict resolution (pp. 120-137). New York, NY: Oxford University Press. [pdf]

• Crusius, J., & Mussweiler, T. (2012). To achieve or not to achieve? Comparative mindsets elicit assimilation and contrast in goal priming. European Journal of Social Psychology, 42, 780-788. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.873  [pdf]

• Crusius, J., & Mussweiler, T. (2012). When people want what others have: The impulsive side of envious desire. Emotion, 12, 142-153. https://doi.org/doi:10.1037/a0023523 [pdf]

• Crusius, J., van Horen, F., & Mussweiler, T. (2012). Why process matters: A social cognition perspective on economic behavior. Journal of Economic Psychology, 33, 677-685. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2011.09.004  [pdf]

• Dickert, S., Herbig, B., Glöckner, A., Gansen, C., & Portack, R. (2012). The more the better? Effects of training, experience and information amount in legal judgments. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 26, 223-233. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1813

• Fiedler, S., & Glöckner, A. (2012). The dynamics of decision making in risky choice: An eye-tracking analysis. Frontiers in psychology, 3, 25643. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00335  [data and materials on OSF]

• Fiedler, S., Glöckner, A., & Nicklisch, A. (2012). The influence of Social Value Orientation on information processing in repeated Voluntary Contribution Mechanism games: An eye-tracking analysis. In A. Innocenti & A. Sirigu (Eds.), Neuroscience and the economics of decision making. New York, NY: Routledge.

• Glöckner, A., & Betsch, T. (2012). Decisions beyond boundaries: When more information is processed faster than less. Acta Psychologica, 139, 532-542. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2012.01.009

• Glöckner, A., & Hilbig, B. E. (2012). Risk is relative: Risk aversion yields cooperation rather than defection in cooperation-friendly environments. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 19, 546-553. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-012-0224-z

• Glöckner, A., & Pachur, T. (2012). Cognitive models of risky choice: Parameter stability and predictive accuracy of prospect theory. Cognition, 123, 21-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2011.12.002  [data and materials on OSF]

• Glöckner, A., Fiedler, S., Hochman, G., Ayal, S., & Hilbig, B. E. (2012). Processing differences between descriptions and experience: A comparative analysis using eye-tracking and physiological measures. Frontiers in psychology, 3, 173. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00173

• Glöckner, A., Heinen, T., Johnson, J. G., & Raab, M. (2012). Network approaches for expert decisions in sports. Human Movement Science, 31, 318-333. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humov.2010.11.002

• Gollwitzer, M., Rothmund, T., Alt, B., & Jekel, M. (2012). Victim sensitivity and the accuracy of social judgments. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38, 975-984. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167212440887

• Hachfeld, A., Schroeder, S., Anders, Y., Hahn, A., & Kunter, M. (2012). Multikulturelle Überzeugungen. Herkunft oder Überzeugung? Welche Rolle spielen der Migrationshintergrund und multikulturelle Überzeugungen für das Unterrichten von Kindern mit Migrationshintergrund? [Cultural background or cultural beliefs? What role do immigration background and multicultural beliefs play for teaching children with immigrant backgrounds?]. Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie, 26, 101-120. https://doi.org/10.1024/1010-0652/a000064

• Inbar, Y., & Lammers, J. (2012). Ideological diversity in social and personality psychology: questions and answers. SPSP Dialogue. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2167052

• Inbar, Y., & Lammers, J. (2012). Political diversity in social and personality psychology. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7, 496-503. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612448792

• Jekel, M., Glöckner, A., Fiedler, S., & Bröder, A. (2012). The rationality of different kinds of intuitive decision processes. Synthese, 189, 147-160. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-012-0126-7

• Johnson, C. S., & Lammers, J. (2012). The powerful disregard social comparison information. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48, 329-334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2011.10.010

• Lammers, J. (2012). Abstraction increases hypocrisy. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48, 475-480. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2011.07.006

• Lammers, J., & Yang, H. (2012). Feelings of power lead people to take sides with other powerful parties. Revista de Psicología Social, 27, 337-346. https://doi.org/10.1174/021347412802845612

• Lammers, J., Galinsky, A. D., Gordijn, E. H., & Otten, S. (2012). Power increases social distance. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 3, 282-290. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550611418679

• Mussweiler, T., & Posten, A.-C. (2012). Relatively certain! Comparative thinking reduces uncertainty. Cognition, 122, 236-240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2011.10.005

• Mussweiler, T., Todd, A. R., & Crusius, J. (2012). The cognitive underpinnings of social behavior: Selectivity in social cognition. In P. Hammerstein & J. R. Stevens (Eds.), Strüngmann Forum Reports: Vol. 11. Evolution and the mechanisms of decision making (pp. 275-286). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.  [pdf]

• Renneberg, B., Herm, K., Hahn, A., Staebler, K., Lammers, C., & Roepke, S. (2012). Perception of social participation in borderline personality disorder. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy, 19, 473-480. https://doi.org/10.1002/cpp.772

• Stoker, J. I., Van der Velde, M., & Lammers, J. (2012). Factors relating to managerial stereotypes: The role of gender of the employee and the manager and management gender ratio. Journal of Business and Psychology, 27, 31-42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-011-9210-0

2011

• Ashby, N. J. S., Glöckner, A., & Dickert, S. (2011). Conscious and unconscious thought in risky choice: Testing the capacity principle and the appropriate weighting principle of Unconscious Thought Theory. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, 261. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00261

• Corcoran, K., Crusius, J., & Mussweiler, T. (2011). Social comparison: Motives, standards, and mechanisms. In D. Chadee (Ed.), Theories in social psychology (pp. 119-139). Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell. [pdf]

• Galinsky, A. D., Rus, D., & Lammers, J. (2011). Power: A central force governing psychological, social, and organizational life. In D. De Cremer, R. van Dick, & J. K. Murnighan (Eds.), Social psychology and organizations (pp. 17-38). New York, NY: Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.

• Glöckner, A., & Betsch, T. (2011). The empirical content of theories in judgment and decision making: Shortcomings and remedies. Judgment and Decision Making, 6, 711-721. [pdf]

• Glöckner, A., & Bröder, A. (2011). Processing of recognition information and additional cues: A model-based analysis of choice, confidence, and response time. Judgment and Decision Making, 6, 23-42. [pdf]

• Glöckner, A., & Ebert, I. D. (2011). Legal intuition and expertise. In M. Sinclair (Ed.), Handbook of intuition research (pp. 157-167). Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing.

• Glöckner, A., & Herbold, A.-K. (2011). An eye-tracking study on information processing in risky decisions: Evidence for compensatory strategies based on automatic processes. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 24, 71-98. https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.684

• Glöckner, A., & Hilbig, B. E. (2011). Editorial: Methodology in judgment and decision making research. Judgment and Decision Making, 6, 705-710. [pdf]

• Glöckner, A., & Hochman, G. (2011). The interplay of experience-based affective and probabilistic cues in decision making. Experimental Psychology, 58, 132-141. https://doi.org/10.1027/1618-3169/a000078

• Glöckner, A., & Hodges, S. D. (2011). Parallel constraint satisfaction in memory-based decisions. Experimental Psychology, 58, 180-195. https://doi.org/10.1027/1618-3169/a000084

• Glöckner, A., & Landsberg, M. (2011). Der Schöffe entscheidet: Eine empirische Studie zum Entscheidungsverhalten von Schöffen. Richter ohne Robe, 23, 44-47.

• Glöckner, A., Irlenbusch, B., Kube, S., Nicklisch, A., & Normann, H.-T. (2011). Leading with(out) sacrifice? A public-goods experiment with a privileged player. Economic Inquiry, 49, 591-597. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-7295.2010.00314.x

• Hachfeld, A., Hahn, A., Schroeder, S., Anders, Y., Stanat, P., & Kunter, M. (2011). Assessing teachers’ multicultural and egalitarian beliefs: The Teacher Cultural Beliefs Scale. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27, 986-996. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2011.04.006

• Han, G. , & Jekel, M. (2011). The mediating role of job satisfaction between leader-member exchange and turnover intentions. Journal of Nursing Management, 19, 41-49. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2834.2010.01184.x

• Hilbig, B. E., & Glöckner, A. (2011). Yes, they can! Appropriate weighting of small probabilities as a function of information acquisition. Acta Psychologica, 138, 390-396. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2011.09.005

• Jekel, M., Fiedler, S., & Glöckner, A. (2011). Diagnostic task selection for strategy classification in judgment and decision making: Theory, validation, and implementation in R. Judgment and Decision Making, 6, 782-799. [pdf] [materials]

• Lammers, J., & Gast, A. (2011). Power in the House. In T. V. Cascio & L. M. Martin (Eds.), House and psychology: Humanity is overrated. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

• Lammers, J., & Stapel, D. A. (2011). Power increases dehumanization. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 14, 113-126. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430210370042

• Lammers, J., Stoker, J. I., Jordan, J., Pollmann, M., & Stapel, D. A. (2011). Power increases infidelity among men and women. Psychological Science, 22, 1191-1197. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611416252

• Mischkowski, D., & Klauk, B. (2011). Narcissists as risk factors for companies. Psychology and empiricism of the Narcissistic Personality Disorder. Personalführung, 2, 16-24.

• Towfigh, E. V., & Glöckner, A. (2011). Game over: Empirical support for soccer bets regulation. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 17, 475-506. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023402

2010

• Betsch, T., & Glöckner, A. (2010). Intuition in judgment and decision making: Extensive thinking without effort. Psychological Inquiry, 21, 279-294. https://doi.org/10.1080/1047840X.2010.517737

• Engel, C., Glöckner, A., & Schönfeldt, K. (2010). Informationsverzerrungen bei rechtlichen Entscheidungen. Richter ohne Robe, 22, 135-136.

• Glöckner, A. (2010). Multiple measure strategy classification: Outcomes, decision times and confidence ratings. In A. Glöckner & C. L. M. Witteman (Eds.), Foundations for tracing intuition: Challenges and methods (pp. 83-105). London, UK: Psychology Press & Routledge.

• Glöckner, A., & Betsch, T. (2010). Accounting for critical evidence while being precise and avoiding the strategy selection problem in a parallel constraint satisfaction approach: A reply to Marewski (2010). Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 23, 468-472. https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.688

• Glöckner, A., & Towfigh, E. (2010). Geschicktes Glücksspiel: Die Sportwette als Grenzfall des Glücksspielrechts. JuristenZeitung, 65(21), 1027-1035. https://doi.org/10.1628/002268810793333230

• Glöckner, A., & Witteman, C. L. M. (2010). Beyond dual-process models: A categorisation of processes underlying intuitive judgement and decision making. Thinking & Reasoning, 16, 1-25. https://doi.org/10.1080/13546780903395748

• Glöckner, A., & Witteman, C. L. M. (2010). Foundations for tracing intuition: Challenges and methods. London, UK: Psychology Press & Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203861936

• Glöckner, A., & Witteman, C. L. M. (2010). Foundations for tracing intuition: Models, findings, categorizations. In A. Glöckner & C. L. M. Witteman (Eds.), Foundations for tracing intuition: Challenges and methods (pp. 1-23). London, UK: Psychology Press & Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203861936

• Glöckner, A., Betsch, T., & Schindler, N. (2010). Coherence shifts in probabilistic inference tasks. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 23, 439-462. https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.668

• Hahn, A., Judd, C. M., & Park, B. (2010). Thinking about group differences: Ideologies and national identities. Psychological Inquiry, 21 , 120-126. https://doi.org/10.1080/1047840X.2010.483997

• Hanko, K., Crusius, J., & Mussweiler, T. (2010). When I and me are different: Assimilation and contrast in temporal self-comparisons. European Journal of Social Psychology, 40, 160-168. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.625  [pdf]

• Hochman, G., Ayal, S., & Glöckner, A. (2010). Physiological arousal in processing recognition information: Ignoring or integrating cognitive cues? Judgment and Decision Making, 5, 285-299.  [pdf]

• Hochman, G., Glöckner, A., & Yechiam, E. (2010). Physiological measures in identifying decision strategies. In A. Glöckner & C. L. M. Witteman (Eds.), Foundations for tracing intuition: Challenges and methods (pp. 139-159). London, UK: Psychology Press & Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203861936

• Jekel, M., Nicklisch, A., & Glöckner, A. (2010). Implementation of the Multiple-Measure Maximum Likelihood strategy classification method in R: Addendum to Glöckner (2009) and practical guide for application. Judgment and Decision Making, 5, 54-63.  [pdf]  [data and materials]

• Lammers, J., Stapel, D. A., & Galinsky, A. D. (2010). Power increases hypocrisy: Moralizing in reasoning, immorality in behavior. Psychological Science, 21, 737-744. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797610368810

• Lammers, J., Stoker, J. I., & Stapel, D. A. (2010). Power and behavioral approach orientation in existing power relations and the mediating effect of income. European Journal of Social Psychology, 40, 543-551. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.702

• Witteman, C. L. M., & Glöckner, A. (2010). Tracing intuition: Summing up and exemplified method applications. In A. Glöckner & C. L. M. Witteman (Eds.), Foundations for tracing intuition: Challenges and methods (pp. 272-278). London, UK: Psychology Press & Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203861936

2009

• Glöckner, A. (2009). „Neurorecht“ ohne Psychologie? Die Rolle verhaltenswissenschaftlicher Betrachtungsebenen bei der Ableitung rechtspolitischer Empfehlungen. In S. Schleim, T. M. Spranger, & H. Walter (Eds.), Von der Neuroethik zum Neurorecht? (pp. 104-131). Göttingen, Germany: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht. [pdf]

• Glöckner, A. (2009). Investigating intuitive and deliberate processes statistically: The multiple-measure maximum likelihood strategy classification method. Judgment and Decision Making, 4, 186-199. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1930297500001728  [data and materials]

• Glöckner, A., & Moritz, S. (2009). A fine-grained analysis of the jumping-to-conclusions bias in schizophrenia: Data-gathering, response confidence, and information integration. Judgment and Decision Making, 4, 587-600. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1930297500001157 

• Glöckner, A., & Schönfeldt, K. (2009). Ich überlege. Mein Bauch entscheidet? - Intuition und Entscheidung. Richter ohne Robe, 21, 60-61.

• Horstmann, N., Ahlgrimm, A., & Glöckner, A. (2009). How distinct are intuition and deliberation? An eye-tracking analysis of instruction-induced decision modes. Judgment and Decision Making, 4, 335-354. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1930297500001182 

• Lammers, J., & Galinsky, A. D. (2009). The conceptualization of power and the nature of interdependency: The role of legitimacy and culture. In D. Tjosvold & B. Wisse (Eds.), Power and interdependence in organizations (pp. 67-82). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511626562.006   

• Lammers, J., & Stapel, D. A. (2009). How power influences moral thinking. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 279-289. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015437

• Lammers, J., Gordijn, E. H., & Otten, S. (2009). Iron ladies, men of steel: The effects of gender stereotyping on the perception of male and female candidates are moderated by prototypicality. European Journal of Social Psychology, 39, 186-195. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.505

• Lammers, J., Stoker, J. I., & Stapel, D. A. (2009). Differentiating social and personal power: Opposite effects on stereotyping, but parallel effects on behavioral approach tendencies. Psychological Science, 20, 1543-1549. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02479.x

2008

• Glöckner, A. (2008). How evolution outwits bounded rationality: The efficient interaction of automatic and deliberate processes in decision making and implications for institutions. In C. Engel & W. Singer (Eds.), Better than conscious? Decision making, the human mind, and implications for institutions (pp. 259-284). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. [pdf]

• Glöckner, A., & Betsch, T. (2008). Do people make decisions under risk based on ignorance? An empirical test of the priority heuristic against cumulative prospect theory. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 107, 75-95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2008.02.003

• Glöckner, A., & Betsch, T. (2008). Modeling option and strategy choices with connectionist networks: Towards an integrative model of automatic and deliberate decision making. Judgment and Decision Making, 3, 215-228. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1930297500002424  

• Glöckner, A., & Betsch, T. (2008). Multiple-reason decision making based on automatic processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34, 1055-1075.https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.34.5.1055

• Lammers, J., Galinsky, A. D., Gordijn, E. H., & Otten, S. (2008). Illegitimacy moderates the effects of power on approach. Psychological Science, 19, 558-564. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02123.x

• Lammers, J., Gordijn, E. H., & Otten, S. (2008). Looking through the eyes of the powerful. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 1229-1238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2008.03.015

• McElreath, R., Boyd, R., Gigerenzer, G., Glöckner, A., Hammerstein, P., Kurzban, R., … Stevens, J. R. (2008). Individual decision making and the evolutionary roots of institutions. In C. Engel & W. Singer (Eds.), Better than conscious? Decision making, the human mind, and implications for institutions (pp. 325-342). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. [pdf]

2007

• Glöckner, A. (2007). Does intuition beat fast and frugal heuristics? A systematic empirical analysis. In H. Plessner, C. Betsch, & T. Betsch (Eds.), Intuition in judgment and decision making (pp. 309-325). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. [pdf]

2006

• Glöckner, A. (2006). Automatische Prozesse bei Entscheidungen. Hamburg, Germany: Kovac.

2005

• Haberstroh, S., Betsch, T., Glöckner, A., Haar, T., & Stiller, A. (2005). The impact of routines on deliberate decisions: The microworld-simulation COMMERCE. In T. Betsch & S. Haberstroh (Eds.), The routines of decision making (pp. 211–229). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

2004

• Betsch, T., Haberstroh, S., Molter, B., & Glöckner, A. (2004). Oops, I did it again—Relapse errors in routinized decision making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 93, 62-74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2003.09.002

2003

• Glöckner, A., & Grüner, K. (2003). Effizientes Online-Verfahren für die Personalentwicklung: 360° Führungsfeedback. Planung & Analyse, 2, 85–90.

2002

• Schubert, T., & Crusius, J. (2002). Five theses on the book problem: Presence in books, film and VR. In F. R. Gouveia & F. Biocca (Eds.), Proceedings of the fifth international workshop on presence (pp. 53–59). Porto, Portugal: Universidad Fernando Pessoa.  [pdf]

2001

• Betsch, T., Haberstroh, S., Glöckner, A., Haar, T., & Fiedler, K. (2001). The effects of routine strength on adaptation and information search in recurrent decision making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 84, 23–53. https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.2000.2916

2000

• Betsch, T., Glöckner, A., & Haberstroh, S. (2000). COMMERCE—A micro-world simulation to study routine maintenance and deviation in repeated decision making. Methods of Psychological Research, 5. [full text]