skip to content

Faculty of Human SciencesSocial Cognition Center Cologne

Glöckner Group | Publications

in press | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2000

 

In press

  • M., Nuding, S., Schramm, L., Glöckner, A., Gruber, R., Hajek, K., Häusser, J., Imhoff, R., & Rudert, S. (in press). How the pandemic affected psychological research. Royal Society Open Science. 

  • Glöckner, A., Gollwitzer, M., Hahn, L., Lange, J., Sassenberg, K., & Unkelbach, C. (in press). Quality, Replicability, and Transparency in Research in Social Psychology: Implementation of Recommendations in Germany. Social Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000548 

 

To top of page

2024

  • Wojtczuk-Turek, A., Turek, D., Edgar, F., Klein, H. J., Bosak, J., Okay-Somerville, B., Fu, N., Raeder, S., Jurek, P., Lupina-Wegener, A., Dvorakova, Z., Gutiérrez-Crocco, F., Kekkonen, A., Leiva, P. I., Mynaříková, L., Sánchez-Apellániz, M., Shafique, I., Al-Romeedy, B. S., Wee, S., … Karamustafa-Köse, G. (2024). Sustainable human resource management and job satisfaction—Unlocking the power of organizational identification: A cross-cultural perspective from 54 countries. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 31(5), 4910–4932. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2815

  • Glöckner, A., & Fiedler, S. (2024). The Future of Social Perception Models: Further Directions for Theoretical Development of the Inductive Reasoning Model. Psychological Inquiry, 35(1), 30–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/1047840X.2024.2366793

  • Glöckner, A., & Fiedler, S. (2024). “Theory Specification and Theory Building in Psychology”: A Topical Issue of the Zeitschrift für Psychologie. Zeitschrift Für Psychologie, 232(1), 68–70. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000541

  • Glöckner, A., Jekel, M., & Lisovoj, D. (2024). Using machine learning to evaluate and enhance models of probabilistic inference.Decision, 11(4), 633–651. https://doi.org/10.1037/dec0000233

  • Glöckner, A., Gollwitzer, M., Hahn, L., Lange, J., Sassenberg, K., & Unkelbach, C. (2024). Quality, Replicability, and Transparency in Research in Social Psychology: Implementation of Recommendations in Germany. Social Psychology, 55(3), 134–147. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000548

  • Glöckner, A. (2024). Big Data und Quick Data: Konsequenz für eine effiziente Wissenschaft. In R. Niemann, M. Wendland & J. Zollner (Eds.), Smart Regulation: Quick Data or Big Data (pp. 3-12).Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck. https://doi.org/10.1628/978-3-16-162203-8 [Link]

  • Andersson, P. A., Vartanova, I., Västfjäll, D., Tinghög, G., Strimling, P., Wu, J., ...  & Eriksson, K. (2024). Anger and disgust shape judgments of social sanctions across cultures, especially in high individual autonomy societies. Scientific Reports, 14(1), 5591. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-55815-x [data and materials on OSF]

  • Glöckner, A. (2024). Big Data und Quick Data: Konsequenz für eine effiziente Wissenschaft. In R. Niemann, M. Wendland & J. Zollner (Eds.), Smart Regulation: Quick Data or Big Data (pp. 3-12).Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck. https://doi.org/10.1628/978-3-16-162203-8 [Link]

  • Saxler, F. M., Dorrough, A. R., Froehlich, L., Block, K., Croft, A., Meeuussen, L., Olsson, M., Schader, T., Schuster, C., van Grootel, S., van Laar, C., Atkinson, C., Benson-Greenwald, T., Birneanu, A., Cavojova, V., Cheryan, S., Chung, A. L. K., Danyliuk, I., Dar-Nimrod, I., , . . . Martiny, S. E. (2024). Did Descriptive and Prescriptive Norms About Gender Equality at Home Change During the COVID-19 Pandemic? A Cross-National Investigation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672231219719 [data and materials on OSF]

2023

  • Rahmani Azad, Z., Goedderz, A., & Hahn, A. (2023). Self-Awareness and Stereotypes: Accurate Prediction of Implicit Gender Stereotyping. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 49(12), 1695-1708. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672221120703

  • Schermer, J. A., Rogoza, R., Kwiatkowska, M. M., Kowalski, C. M., Aquino, S., Ardi, R., … Crusius, J. … Krammer, G. (2023). Humor styles across 28 countries. Current Psychology, 42, 16304-16319. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-019-00552-y

To top of page

2022

  • Crusius, J. (2022). Soziale Vergleiche [Social comparison]. In P. Ozimek, H.-W. Bierhoff, E. Rohmann, & S. Hanke (Eds.), Angewandte Sozialpsychologie: Ein Lehrbuch (pp. 27-41). Stuttgart: Kohlhammer.

  • Dorrough, A. R., Leszczyńska, M., Werner*, S., Schaeffer*, L., Simandi*, F., Galley*, A.-S., Akin*, E., Bachmann*, J., Bruske*, M., & Burghardt*, U. (2022). Equal performance, different grade: Women’s performance in discussion perceived worse than men’s. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 48(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167221992213 [data and materials on OSF] *The 3rd-10th author were students under the supervision of the first author.

  • Goedderz, A., & Hahn, A. (2022). Biases left unattended: People are surprised at racial bias feedback until they pay attention to their biased reactions. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 102, 104374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2022.104374

  • Lange, J., Unkelbach, C., Glöckner, A., Gollwitzer, M., Kaiser, F. G., & Sassenberg, K. (2022). Fachgruppe Sozialpsychologie. Task Force “Qualitätssicherung sozialpsychologischer Forschung” der Fachgruppe Sozialpsychologie. Das Zusammenspiel von Theorie und Methodik. Psychologische Rundschau, 73(1), 22-24. https://doi.org/10.1026/0033-3042/a000565

  • Leising, D., Thielmann, I., Glöckner, A., Gärtner, A., & Schönbrodt, F. (2022). Ten steps toward a better personality science - How quality may be rewarded more in research evaluation. Personality Science, (3): e6029. https://doi.org/10.5964/ps.6029

  • Liu, S., Zhu, J.J., Liu, Y.T., Wilbanks, D., Jackson, J. C., Mu Y. (2022) Perception of strong social norms during the COVID-19 pandemic is linked to positive psychological outcomes. BMC Public Health, 22, Article 1403. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-13744-2

  • Walkowitz, G., Belianin, A. & Dorrough, A. R. (2022). Editorial: Inter-cultural cooperation: The role of attitudes, (shared) expectations, and behavioral standards. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, Article 1044588. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1044588

To top of page

2021

  • Amit, E., Han, E., Posten, A.-C., & Sloman, S. (2021). How people judge institutional corruption. Connecticut Law Review, 52(3), 1121-1138. [pdf]

  • Fiedler, S., Glöckner, A., & Hellmann, M. (2021). Altruistic giving towards refugees: Identifying factors that increase citizens’ willingness to help. Frontiers in Psychology, 12(3127). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.689184

  • Fleischmann, A., Lammers, J., Conway, P., & Galinsky, A. D. (2021). Kant be compared: People high in social comparison orientation make fewer—not more—deontological decisions in sacrificial dilemmas. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 12(6), 984-995. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550620947294 [data and materials on OSF]

  • Genschow, O., Westfal, M., Crusius, J., Bartosch, L., Feikes, K. I., Pallasch, N., & Wozniak, M. (2021). Does social psychology persist over half a century? A direct replication of Cialdini et al.’s (1975) classic door-in-the-face technique. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 120(2), e1–e7. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspa0000261 [preprint] [data and materials on OSF]

  • Glöckner, A. (2021). Prospect theory. In M. Knauff & W. Spohn (Eds.), The Handbook of Rationality (pp. 485-493). MIT Press. [full text]

  • Greenwald, A. G., Brendl, M., Cai, H., Cvencek, D., Dovidio, J. F., Friese, M., ... & Wiers, R. W. (2021). Best research practices for using the Implicit Association Test. Behavior research methods, 1-20. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-021-01624-3

  • Liu, S., Zhang, R.Y., & Kishimoto, T. (2021). Analysis and prospect of clinical psychology based on topic models: hot research topics and scientific trends in the latest decades. Psychology, Health & Medicine, 26(4), 395-407. https://doi.org/10.1080/13548506.2020.1738019

  • Schäfer, S. J., Simsek, M., Jaspers, E., Kros, M., Hewstone, M., Schmid, K., Fell, B. F., Dorrough, A. R., Glöckner, A., & Christ. O. (2021). Dynamic contact effects: Individuals’ positive and negative contact history influences intergroup contact effects in a behavioral game. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000374

  • Weiss, A., Dorrough, A. R., & Schmitz*, L. (2021). Analytic atheism in a low-religiosity culture: Examining the relationship between analytic thinking and religious belief in Germany. Personality and Individual Differences, 178, Article 110854. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2021.110854 [data and materials on OSF] *The 3rd author was a student under the supervision of the second author.

To top of page

2020

  • Dorrough, A. R., Olsson, M. I. T., Froehlich, L., Glöckner, A., & Martiny, S. E. (2020). Does she compensate the victim while he punishes the perpetrator? No gender differences in anonymous economic games across 11 nations. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 34(2), 261-274. https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.2208 [data and materials on OSF]

  • Engel, C., Timme, S., & Glöckner, A. (2020). Coherence-based reasoning and order effects in legal judgments. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 26, 333-352. https://doi.org/10.1037/law0000257

  • Fischer, I., Avrashi, S., Oz, T., Fadul, R., Gutman, K., Rubenstein, D., ... & Glöckner, A. (2020). The behavioural challenge of the COVID-19 pandemic: indirect measurements and personalized attitude changing treatments (IMPACT). Royal Society open science, 7(8), 201131. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.201131

  • Froehlich, L., Olsson, M. I. T., Dorrough, A. R., & Martiny, S. E. (2020). Gender at work across nations: Men and women working in male‐dominated and female‐dominated occupations are differentially associated with agency and communion. Journal of Social Issues, 76(3), 484-511. https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12390 [data and materials on OSF]

  • Glöckner, A. (2020). Legitimität und Rechtsbefolgung: Eine empirisch-psychologische Perspektive. In T. Herbst & S. Zucca-Soest (Eds.), Legitimität des Staates (pp.47-64). Baden-Baden: Nomos. https://doi.org/10.5771/9783748902638    

  • Hahn, A., & Goedderz, A. (2020). Trait-unconsciousness, state-unconsciousness, preconsciousness, and social miscalibration in the context of implicit evaluation. Social Cognition, 38(Supplement), 115-134. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2020.38.supp.s115

  • Jekel, M., Fiedler, S., Allstadt Torras, R., Mischkowski, D., Dorrough, A. R., & Glöckner, A. (2020). How to teach open science principles in the undergraduate curriculum — the Hagen Cumulative Science Project. Psychology Learning & Teaching, 19(1), 91-106. https://doi.org/10.1177/1475725719868149

  • Kranz, D. & Goedderz, A. (2020). Coming home from a stay abroad: Associations between young people’s reentry problems and their cultural identity formation. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 74, 115-126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2019.11.003

  • Lammers, J., Crusius, J., & Gast, A. (2020). Correcting misperceptions of exponential coronavirus growth increases support for social distancing. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(28), 16264-16266. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2006048117 [data on OSF]

  • Phills, C. E., Hahn, A., & Gawronski, B. (2020). The bidirectional causal relation between implicit stereotypes and implicit prejudice. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 46(9), 1318-1330. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167219899234 [osf] 

  • Wulff, L., & Scharf, S. E. (2020). Unpacking stereotype influences on source-monitoring processes: What mouse tracking can tell us. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 87, 10391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2019.103917

To top of page

2019

  • Bai, Q., Liu, S., & Kishimoto, T. (2019). School incivility and academic burnout: the mediating role of perceived peer support and the moderating role of future academic self-salience. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 3016. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.03016

  • Gawronski, B., & Hahn, A. (2019). Implicit measures: Procedures, use, and interpretation. In H. Blanton, J. M. LaCroix, & G. D. Webster (Eds.), Measurement in social psychology (pp. 29-55). New York, NY: Taylor & Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429452925-2

  • Glöckner, A. (2019). Der Mensch im Spannungsfeld zwischen (begrenzter) Rationalität, Eigeninteresse und Kooperation: Welches Wesen adressiert das Recht? In A. Funke & U. Schmalke (Eds.), Menschenbilder im Recht (pp. 79-91).Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.https://doi.org/10.1628/978-3-16-157698-0

  • Glöckner, A., & Jekel, M. (2019). Testing cognitive models by a joint analysis of multiple dependent measures. In M. Schulte-Mecklenbeck et al. (Eds.), Handbook of Process Tracing (2nd Edition) (pp. 356-373). New York: Routledge.

  • Kannegießer, A., Orth, C., Posten, A.-C., & Hoese, M. (2019). Neue Föderative Gutachtenstandards - Die Quadratur des Kreises? Praxis der Rechtspsychologie, 29, 147-151.

  • Mischkowski, D., Stone, R., & Stremitzer, A. (2019). Promises, expectations, and social cooperation. The Journal of Law and Economics, 62(4), 687-712. https://doi.org/10.1086/706075

  • Posten, A.-C., & Kitzig, C. (2019). Strategische Merkmalsnutzung zur Erkennung und Tarnung von Lügen aus der Perspektive von Laien [Strategic cue application to detect and disguise lies from lay people’s perspective]. Praxis der Rechtspsychologie. [pdf]

  • Posten, A-.C., Bliesener, T., Dahle, K.-P., & Orth, C. (2019). Zur Expertise forensischer Sachverständiger - Ein Positionspapier [On the expertise of forensic expert witnesses - A position paper]. Psychologische Rundschau, 70, 259-260. https://doi.org/10.1026/0033-3042/a000458

To top of page

2018

  • Betsch, T., Lehmann, A., Jekel, M., Lindow, S., & Glöckner, A. (2018). Children’s application of decision strategies in a compensatory environment. Judgment and Decision Making, 13(6), 514-528. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1930297500006562 [data]

  • Glöckner, A., Fiedler, S., & Renkewitz, F. (2018). Belastbare und effiziente Wissenschaft: Strategische Ausrichtung von Forschungsprozessen als Weg aus der Replikationskrise. Psychologische Rundschau, 69, 22-36. https://doi.org/10.1026/0033-3042/a000384

  • Hahn, A., & Gawronski, B. (2018). Implicit social cognition. In J. T. Wixted (Ed.), The Stevens’ handbook of experimental psychology and cognitive neuroscience (4th ed., Vol. 4, pp. 395-427). New York, NY: Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119170174.epcn412

  • Jekel, M., & Glöckner, A. (2018). How to identify strategy use and adaptive strategy selection: The crucial role of chance correction in weighted compensatory strategies. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 31, 265-279. https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.1983

  • Jekel, M., & Glöckner, A. (2018). Meaningful model comparisons have to include reasonable competing models and also all data: A rejoinder to Rieskamp (2018). Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 31, 289-293. https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.2076

  • Lammers, J., & Baldwin, M. (2018). Past-focused temporal communication overcomes conservatives' resistance to liberal political ideas. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 114(4), 599-619. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000121  [data on OSF]

  • Lammers, J., Gast, A., Unkelbach, C., & Galinsky, A. D. (2018). Moral character impression formation depends on the valence homogeneity of the context. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 9(5), 576-585. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550617714585  [data on OSF]

  • Lange, J., Blatz, L., & Crusius, J. (2018). Dispositional envy: A conceptual review. In V. Zeigler-Hill & T. K. Shackelford (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of personality and individual differences. Volume III: Applications of personality and individual differences (pp. 424-439). London, UK: SAGE. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781526451248  [pdf]

  • Marewski, J. N., Bröder, A., & Glöckner, A. (2018). Some metatheoretical reflections on adaptive decision making and the strategy selection problem. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 31(2), 181-198. https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.2075

  • Mischkowski, D., Glöckner, A., & Lewisch, P. (2018). From spontaneous cooperation to spontaneous punishment – Distinguishing the underlying motives driving spontaneous behavior in first and second order public good games. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 149, 59-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2018.07.001 [data and materials on OSF]

  • Posten, A.-C., & Steinmetz, J. (2018). Temperatur und Zustimmung - ein bisher unbekannter Zusammenhang. Einblicke für Praxis und Forschung. Praxis der Rechtspsychologie, 2, 137-152. [pdf]

  • Steinmetz, J., & Posten, A.-C. (2018). White lies and black lies: What they have in common and how they differ. In-Mind Magazine. [full text]

  • Stürmer, S., Christ, O., Jonkmann, K., Josephs, I., Gaschler, R., Glöckner, A., … Salewski, C. (2018). 10 Jahre universitäres Fernstudium in Psychologie an der FernUniversität in Hagen. Psychologische Rundschau, 69, 104-108. https://doi.org/10.1026/0033-3042/a000400

  • Towfigh, E. V., Traxler, C., & Glöckner, A. (2018). Geschlechts- und Herkunftseffekte bei der Benotung juristischer Staatsprüfungen. Zeitschrift Für Didaktik Der Rechtswissenschaft, 5, 115-142. https://doi.org/10.5771/2196-7261-2018-2-115

  • Verschuere, B., Meijer, E. H., Jim, A., Hoogesteyn, K., Orthey, R., McCarthy, R. J., … Blatz, L., … Crusius, J., … Yıldız, E (2018). Registered Replication Report on Mazar, Amir, and Ariely (2008). Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1, 299-317. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918781032 [data and materials on OSF]

To top of page

2017

  • Amit, E., Koralnik, J., Posten, A.-C., Muethel, M., & Lessig, L. (2017). Institutional corruption revisited: Exploring open questions within the institutional corruption literature. Southern California Interdisciplinary Law Journal, 26, 447-595. [pdf]

  • Bouwmeester, S., Verkoeijen, P. P. J. L., Aczel, B., Barbosa, F., Bègue, L., Brañas-Garza, P., … Glöckner, A., … Mischkowski, D., … Wollbrant, C. E. (2017). Registered Replication Report: Rand, Greene, and Nowak (2012). Perspectives on Psychological Science, 12, 527-542. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691617693624  [data and materials on OSF]

  • Crusius*, J., & Lange*, J. (2017). How do people respond to threatened social status? Moderators of benign versus malicious envy. In R. H. Smith, U. Merlone, & M. K. Duffy (Eds.), Envy at work and in organizations (pp. 85-110). New York, NY: Oxford University Press. [pdf] *shared first authorship

  • Dorrough, A. R. (2017). The Determinants of Intergroup Social Dilemma Behavior a Special Focus on Cross National Interactions. Doctoral Thesis published at Göttingen State and University Library.

  • Guinote, A., & Lammers, J. (2017). Accentuation of tending and befriending among the powerless. In M. Bukowski, I. Fritsche, A. Guinote, & M. Kofta (Eds.), Coping with lack of control in a social world (pp. 185-202). New York, NY: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315661452-19   

  • Lammers, J., Dubois, D., Rucker, D. D., & Galinsky, A. D. (2017). Ease of retrieval moderates the effects of power: Implications for the replicability of power recall effects. Social Cognition, 35(1), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2017.35.1.1  [data on OSF]

  • Lammers, J., Koch, A., Conway, P., & Brandt, M. J. (2017). The political domain appears simpler to the politically extreme than to political moderates. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 8(6), 612-622. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550616678456  [data on OSF]

  • Leach, S., Weick, M., & Lammers, J. (2017). Does influence beget autonomy? Clarifying the relationship between social and personal power. Journal of Theoretical Social Psychology, 1(1), 5-14. https://doi.org/10.1002/jts5.5

  • Meijs, M. H. J., Ratliff, K. A., & Lammers, J. (2017). The discrepancy between how women see themselves and feminists predicts identification with feminism. Sex Roles, 77, 293-308. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-016-0733-8

  • Steinmetz*, J., & Posten*, A.-C. (2017). Physical temperature affects response behavior. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 70, 294-300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2016.12.001 *shared first authorship

To top of page

2016

  • Ashby, N. J. S., Jekel, M., Dickert, S., & Glöckner, A. (2016). Finding the right fit: A comparison of process assumptions underlying popular drift-diffusion models. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 42, 1982-1993. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000279

  • Baldwin, M., & Lammers, J. (2016). Past-focused environmental comparisons promote proenvironmental outcomes for conservatives. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113, 14953-14957. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1610834113

  • Corcoran, K., & Crusius, J. (2016). Sozialer Vergleich [Social comparison]. In D. Frey & H.-W. Bierhoff (Eds.), Sozialpsychologie - Soziale Motive und Soziale Einstellungen [Social psychology—Social motives and social attitudes], Enzyklopädie der Psychologie (Vol. C/VI/2, pp. 87-106). Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe.  [pdf]

  • Fleischmann, A., Sieverding, M., Hespenheide, U., Weiß, M., & Koch, S. C. (2016). See feminine – Think incompetent? The effects of a feminine outfit on the evaluation of women’s computer competence. Computers & Education, 95, 63-74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.12.007

  • Glöckner, A., Hilbig, B. E., Henninger, F., & Fiedler, S. (2016). The reversed description-experience gap: Disentangling sources of presentation format effects in risky choice. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 145, 486-508. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0040103  [data and materials on OSF]

  • Glöckner, A. (2016). The irrational hungry judge effect revisited: Simulations reveal that the magnitude of the effect is overestimated. Judgment and Decision Making, 11, 601-610.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S1930297500004812   

  • Lammers, J., & Imhoff, R. (2016). Power and sadomasochism: Understanding the antecedents of a knotty relationship. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 7, 142-148. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550615604452

  • Lammers, J., Stoker, J. I., Rink, F., & Galinsky, A. D. (2016). To have control over or to be free from others? The desire for power reflects a need for autonomy. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 42, 498-512. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167216634064  [data on OSF]

  • Schweinsberg, M., Madan, N., Vianello, M., Sommer, S. A., Jordan, J., Tierney, W., ... Hahn, A., ... Uhlmann, E. L. (2016). The pipeline project: Pre-publication independent replications of a single laboratory’s research pipeline. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 66, 55-67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2015.10.001

  • Seithe, M., Morina, J., & Glöckner, A. (2016). Bonn eXperimental System (BoXS): An open-source platform for interactive experiments in psychology and economics. Behavior Research Methods, 48, 1454-1475. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-015-0660-6

  • Tierney, W., Schweinsberg, M., Jordan, J., Kennedy, D. M., Qureshi, I., Sommer, S. A., ... Hahn, A. ... Uhlmann, E. L. (2016). Data from a pre-publication independent replication initiative examining ten moral judgement effects. Scientific Data, 3, 160082. https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2016.82

  • Towfigh, E. V., Goerg, S. J., Glöckner, A., Leifeld, P., Llorente-Saguer, A., Bade, S., & Kurschilgen, C. (2016). Do direct-democratic procedures lead to higher acceptance than political representation? Experimental survey evidence from Germany. Public Choice, 167, 47-65. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-016-0330-y

To top of page

2015

  • Appel, H., Crusius, J., & Gerlach, A. (2015). Social comparison, envy, and depression on Facebook: A study looking at the effects of high comparison standards on depressed individuals. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 34, 277-289. https://doi.org/10.1521/jscp.2015.34.4.277  [pdf]

  • Crusius, J., & Lange, J. (2015). Envy. In M. Altman (Ed.), Real world decision making: An encyclopaedia of behavioral economics (pp. 122-123). Santa Barbara, CA: Greenwood. [pdf]

  • De Waal-Andrews, W., Gregg, A. P., & Lammers, J. (2015). When status is grabbed and when status is granted: Getting ahead in dominance and prestige hierarchies. British Journal of Social Psychology, 54, 445-464. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12093

  • Feeser, M., Fan, Y., Weigand, A., Hahn, A., Gärtner, M., Böker, H., Grimm, S., & Bajbouj, M. (2015). Oxytocin improves mentalizing – Pronounced effects for individuals with attenuated ability to empathize. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 53, 223-232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psyneuen.2014.12.015

  • Glöckner, A., Tontrup, S., & Bechtold, S. (2015). Disentangling psychological sources of overpricing in anticommons dilemmas: Strategic incentives, endowment effects, and interdependence of outcomes. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 28, 224-238. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bdm.1839  [data and materials on OSF]

  • Glöckner, A., & Towfigh, E. V. (2015). Entscheidungen zwischen „Intuition“ und „Rationalität“. Deutsche Richterzeitung, 7/8, 14-17. [pdf]

  • Hachfeld, A., Hahn, A., Schroeder, S., Anders, Y., & Kunter, M. (2015). Should teachers be colorblind? How multicultural and colorblind beliefs differentially relate to aspects of teachers’ professional competence for teaching in diverse classrooms. Teaching and Teacher Education, 48, 44-55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2015.02.001

  • Hahn, A., Banchefsky, S., Park, B., & Judd, C. M. (2015). Measuring intergroup ideologies: Positive and negative aspects of emphasizing versus looking beyond group differences. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 41, 1646-1664. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167215607351

  • Hahn, A., & Gawronski, B. (2015). Implicit social cognition. In J. D. Wright (Ed.), International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.) (pp. 714-720). Oxford, UK: Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.24066-X  [invited submission]

  • Inbar, Y., & Lammers, J. (2015). Increasing ideological tolerance in social psychology [Peer commentary on “Political diversity will improve social psychological science” by J. L. Duarte et al.]. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 38, e147. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X1400123X

  • Morell, A., Glöckner, A., & Towfigh, E. V. (2015). Sticky rebates: Loyalty rebates impede rational switching of consumers. Journal of Competition Law & Economics, 11, 431-461. https://doi.org/10.1093/joclec/nhv009

To top of page

2014

  • Corcoran, K., & Crusius, J. (2014). Warum sozialpsychologische Forschung für die Rechtswissenschaften von Interesse ist [Why social psychological research is of interest for law]. Austrian Law Journal, 1, 40-47.  [pdf]

  • Engel, C., Beckenkamp, M., Glöckner, A., Irlenbusch, B., Hennig-Schmidt, H., Kube, S., … Towfigh, E. (2014). First impressions are more important than early intervention: Qualifying Broken Windows Theory in the lab. International Review of Law and Economics, 37, 126-136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irle.2013.07.005

  • Feeser, M., Fan, Y., Weigand, A., Hahn, A., Gärtner, M., Aust, S., Böker, H., Bajbouj, M., & Grimm, S. (2014). The beneficial effect of oxytocin on avoidance-related facial emotion recognition depends on early life stress experience. Psychopharmacology, 231, 4735-4744. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00213-014-3631-1

  • Hahn, A., Judd, C. M., Hirsh, H. K., & Blair, I. V. (2014). Awareness of implicit attitudes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143, 1369-1392. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035028

  • Hahn, A., Nunes, A., Park, B., & Judd, C. M. (2014). Social-psychological recommendations for a diverse work environment. In K. M. Thomas, V. C. Plaut, & M. Tran (Eds.), Diversity ideologies in organizations (pp. 236-252). New York, NY: Taylor & Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315852188

  • Hilbig, B. E., Glöckner, A., & Zettler, I. (2014). Personality and prosocial behavior: Linking basic traits and social value orientations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 107, 529-539. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036074

  • Inbar, Y., & Lammers, J. (2014). Political diversity in social psychology: Problems and solutions. In P. Valdesolo & J. Graham (Eds.), Bridging ideological divides, Claremont symposium on applied social psychology. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315644387-10 

  • Lammers, J., & Van Beest, I. (2014). The effects of power on immorality. In J.-W. Van Prooijen & P. A. M. Van Lange (Eds.), Power, politics, and paranoia: Why people are suspicious of their leaders (pp. 17-32). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139565417.004

  • Posten, A.-C., Ockenfels, A., & Mussweiler, T. (2014). How activating cognitive content shapes trust: A subliminal priming study. Journal of Economic Psychology, 41, 12-19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2013.04.002

  • Söllner, A., Bröder, A., Glöckner, A., & Betsch, T. (2014). Single-process versus multiple-strategy models of decision making: Evidence from an information intrusion paradigm. Acta Psychologica, 146, 84-96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2013.12.007

  • Towfigh, E. V., Traxler, C., & Glöckner, A. (2014). Zur Benotung in der Examensvorbereitung und im ersten Examen: eine empirische Analyse. Zeitschrift für Didaktik der Rechtswissenschaft, 1, 8-27. [pdf]

To top of page

2013

  • Bröder, A., Glöckner, A., Betsch, T., Link, D., & Ettlin, F. (2013). Do people learn option or strategy routines in multi-attribute decisions? The answer depends on subtle factors. Acta Psychologica, 143, 200-209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2013.03.005

  • Çelik, P., Lammers, J., van Beest, I., Bekker, M. H. J., & Vonk, R. (2013). Not all rejections are alike: Competence and warmth as a fundamental distinction in social rejection. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49, 635-642. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2013.02.010

  • Çelik, P., van Beest, I., Lammers, J., & Bekker, M. (2013). Implicit threat vigilance among violent offenders diagnosed with antisocial personality disorder: The impact of ostracism and control threat. International Journal of Developmental Science, 7, 47-55. https://doi.org/10.3233/DEV-1312116

  • Crusius, J., & Mussweiler, T. (2013). Untangling envy. The feeling can help us even when it hurts. Scientific American Mind, 24, 35-37.  [pdf]

  • Engel, C., & Glöckner, A. (2013). Role-induced bias in court: An experimental analysis. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 26, 272-284. https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.1761

  • Fiedler, S., Glöckner, A., Nicklisch, A., & Dickert, S. (2013). Social Value Orientation and information search in social dilemmas: An eye-tracking analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 120, 272-284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2012.07.002

  • Glöckner, A., & Engel, C. (2013). Can we trust intuitive jurors? Standards of proof and the probative value of evidence in coherence-based reasoning. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 10, 230-252. https://doi.org/10.1111/jels.12009

  • Lammers, J., Dubois, D., Rucker, D. D., & Galinsky, A. D. (2013). Power gets the job: Priming power improves interview outcomes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49, 776-779. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2013.02.008

  • Latu, I. M., Mast, M. S., Lammers, J., & Bombari, D. (2013). Successful female leaders empower women’s behavior in leadership tasks. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49, 444-448. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2013.01.003

  • Posten, A.-C., & Mussweiler, T. (2013). When distrust frees your mind: The stereotype-reducing effects of distrust. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 105, 567-584. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0033170

  • Towfigh, E. V., Glöckner, A., & Reid, R. (2013). Dangerous games: The psychological case for regulating gambling. Charleston Law Review, 8, 148-189. [pdf]

To top of page

2012

  • Crusius, J., & Mussweiler, T. (2012). Des einen Freud, des anderen ... Gehirn&Geist, 10, 18-23.  [pdf]

  • Crusius, J., & Mussweiler, T. (2012). Social comparison in negotiation. In G. E. Bolton & R. T. A. Croson (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of economic conflict resolution (pp. 120-137). New York, NY: Oxford University Press. [pdf]

  • Crusius, J., & Mussweiler, T. (2012). To achieve or not to achieve? Comparative mindsets elicit assimilation and contrast in goal priming. European Journal of Social Psychology, 42, 780-788. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.873  [pdf]

  • Dickert, S., Herbig, B., Glöckner, A., Gansen, C., & Portack, R. (2012). The more the better? Effects of training, experience and information amount in legal judgments. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 26, 223-233. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1813

  • Glöckner, A., & Hilbig, B. E. (2012). Risk is relative: Risk aversion yields cooperation rather than defection in cooperation-friendly environments. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 19, 546-553. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-012-0224-z

  • Glöckner, A., Fiedler, S., Hochman, G., Ayal, S., & Hilbig, B. E. (2012). Processing differences between descriptions and experience: A comparative analysis using eye-tracking and physiological measures. Frontiers in psychology, 3, 173. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00173

  • Gollwitzer, M., Rothmund, T., Alt, B., & Jekel, M. (2012). Victim sensitivity and the accuracy of social judgments. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38, 975-984. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167212440887

  • Hachfeld, A., Schroeder, S., Anders, Y., Hahn, A., & Kunter, M. (2012). Multikulturelle Überzeugungen. Herkunft oder Überzeugung? Welche Rolle spielen der Migrationshintergrund und multikulturelle Überzeugungen für das Unterrichten von Kindern mit Migrationshintergrund? [Cultural background or cultural beliefs? What role do immigration background and multicultural beliefs play for teaching children with immigrant backgrounds?]. Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie, 26, 101-120. https://doi.org/10.1024/1010-0652/a000064

  • Mussweiler, T., Todd, A. R., & Crusius, J. (2012). The cognitive underpinnings of social behavior: Selectivity in social cognition. In P. Hammerstein & J. R. Stevens (Eds.), Strüngmann Forum Reports: Vol. 11. Evolution and the mechanisms of decision making (pp. 275-286). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.  [pdf]

  • Renneberg, B., Herm, K., Hahn, A., Staebler, K., Lammers, C., & Roepke, S. (2012). Perception of social participation in borderline personality disorder. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy, 19, 473-480. https://doi.org/10.1002/cpp.772

  • Stoker, J. I., Van der Velde, M., & Lammers, J. (2012). Factors relating to managerial stereotypes: The role of gender of the employee and the manager and management gender ratio. Journal of Business and Psychology, 27, 31-42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-011-9210-0

To top of page

2011

  • Ashby, N. J. S., Glöckner, A., & Dickert, S. (2011). Conscious and unconscious thought in risky choice: Testing the capacity principle and the appropriate weighting principle of Unconscious Thought Theory. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, 261. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00261

  • Corcoran, K., Crusius, J., & Mussweiler, T. (2011). Social comparison: Motives, standards, and mechanisms. In D. Chadee (Ed.), Theories in social psychology (pp. 119-139). Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell. [pdf]

  • Glöckner, A., & Betsch, T. (2011). The empirical content of theories in judgment and decision making: Shortcomings and remedies. Judgment and Decision Making, 6, 711-721. [pdf]

  • Glöckner, A., & Bröder, A. (2011). Processing of recognition information and additional cues: A model-based analysis of choice, confidence, and response time. Judgment and Decision Making, 6, 23-42. [pdf]

  • Glöckner, A., & Ebert, I. D. (2011). Legal intuition and expertise. In M. Sinclair (Ed.), Handbook of intuition research (pp. 157-167). Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing.

  • Glöckner, A., & Herbold, A.-K. (2011). An eye-tracking study on information processing in risky decisions: Evidence for compensatory strategies based on automatic processes. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 24, 71-98. https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.684

  • Glöckner, A., & Hilbig, B. E. (2011). Editorial: Methodology in judgment and decision making research. Judgment and Decision Making, 6, 705-710. [pdf]

  • Glöckner, A., & Landsberg, M. (2011). Der Schöffe entscheidet: Eine empirische Studie zum Entscheidungsverhalten von Schöffen. Richter ohne Robe, 23, 44-47.

  • Hachfeld, A., Hahn, A., Schroeder, S., Anders, Y., Stanat, P., & Kunter, M. (2011). Assessing teachers’ multicultural and egalitarian beliefs: The Teacher Cultural Beliefs Scale. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27, 986-996. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2011.04.006

  • Jekel, M., Fiedler, S., & Glöckner, A. (2011). Diagnostic task selection for strategy classification in judgment and decision making: Theory, validation, and implementation in R. Judgment and Decision Making, 6, 782-799. [pdf] [materials]

  • Lammers, J., & Gast, A. (2011). Power in the House. In T. V. Cascio & L. M. Martin (Eds.), House and psychology: Humanity is overrated. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

  • Lammers, J., Stoker, J. I., Jordan, J., Pollmann, M., & Stapel, D. A. (2011). Power increases infidelity among men and women. Psychological Science, 22, 1191-1197. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611416252

  • Mischkowski, D., & Klauk, B. (2011). Narcissists as risk factors for companies. Psychology and empiricism of the Narcissistic Personality Disorder. Personalführung, 2, 16-24.

  • Towfigh, E. V., & Glöckner, A. (2011). Game over: Empirical support for soccer bets regulation. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 17, 475-506. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023402

To top of page

2010

  • Engel, C., Glöckner, A., & Schönfeldt, K. (2010). Informationsverzerrungen bei rechtlichen Entscheidungen. Richter ohne Robe, 22, 135-136.

  • Glöckner, A., & Betsch, T. (2010). Accounting for critical evidence while being precise and avoiding the strategy selection problem in a parallel constraint satisfaction approach: A reply to Marewski (2010). Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 23, 468-472. https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.688

  • Glöckner, A., & Witteman, C. L. M. (2010). Beyond dual-process models: A categorisation of processes underlying intuitive judgement and decision making. Thinking & Reasoning, 16, 1-25. https://doi.org/10.1080/13546780903395748

  • Glöckner, A., & Witteman, C. L. M. (2010). Foundations for tracing intuition: Models, findings, categorizations. In A. Glöckner & C. L. M. Witteman (Eds.), Foundations for tracing intuition: Challenges and methods (pp. 1-23). London, UK: Psychology Press & Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203861936

  • Glöckner, A., Betsch, T., & Schindler, N. (2010). Coherence shifts in probabilistic inference tasks. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 23, 439-462. https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.668

  • Hanko, K., Crusius, J., & Mussweiler, T. (2010). When I and me are different: Assimilation and contrast in temporal self-comparisons. European Journal of Social Psychology, 40, 160-168. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.625  [pdf]

  • Hochman, G., Ayal, S., & Glöckner, A. (2010). Physiological arousal in processing recognition information: Ignoring or integrating cognitive cues? Judgment and Decision Making, 5, 285-299.  [pdf]

  • Hochman, G., Glöckner, A., & Yechiam, E. (2010). Physiological measures in identifying decision strategies. In A. Glöckner & C. L. M. Witteman (Eds.), Foundations for tracing intuition: Challenges and methods (pp. 139-159). London, UK: Psychology Press & Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203861936

  • Jekel, M., Nicklisch, A., & Glöckner, A. (2010). Implementation of the Multiple-Measure Maximum Likelihood strategy classification method in R: Addendum to Glöckner (2009) and practical guide for application. Judgment and Decision Making, 5, 54-63.  [pdf]  [data and materials]

  • Lammers, J., Stapel, D. A., & Galinsky, A. D. (2010). Power increases hypocrisy: Moralizing in reasoning, immorality in behavior. Psychological Science, 21, 737-744. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797610368810

  • Lammers, J., Stoker, J. I., & Stapel, D. A. (2010). Power and behavioral approach orientation in existing power relations and the mediating effect of income. European Journal of Social Psychology, 40, 543-551. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.702

  • Witteman, C. L. M., & Glöckner, A. (2010). Tracing intuition: Summing up and exemplified method applications. In A. Glöckner & C. L. M. Witteman (Eds.), Foundations for tracing intuition: Challenges and methods (pp. 272-278). London, UK: Psychology Press & Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203861936

To top of page

2009

  • Glöckner, A. (2009). „Neurorecht“ ohne Psychologie? Die Rolle verhaltenswissenschaftlicher Betrachtungsebenen bei der Ableitung rechtspolitischer Empfehlungen. In S. Schleim, T. M. Spranger, & H. Walter (Eds.), Von der Neuroethik zum Neurorecht? (pp. 104-131). Göttingen, Germany: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht. [pdf]

  • Glöckner, A., & Moritz, S. (2009). A fine-grained analysis of the jumping-to-conclusions bias in schizophrenia: Data-gathering, response confidence, and information integration. Judgment and Decision Making, 4, 587-600. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1930297500001157 

  • Glöckner, A., & Schönfeldt, K. (2009). Ich überlege. Mein Bauch entscheidet? - Intuition und Entscheidung. Richter ohne Robe, 21, 60-61.

  • Horstmann, N., Ahlgrimm, A., & Glöckner, A. (2009). How distinct are intuition and deliberation? An eye-tracking analysis of instruction-induced decision modes. Judgment and Decision Making, 4, 335-354. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1930297500001182 

  • Lammers, J., & Galinsky, A. D. (2009). The conceptualization of power and the nature of interdependency: The role of legitimacy and culture. In D. Tjosvold & B. Wisse (Eds.), Power and interdependence in organizations (pp. 67-82). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511626562.006   

  • Lammers, J., & Stapel, D. A. (2009). How power influences moral thinking. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 279-289. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015437

  • Lammers, J., Gordijn, E. H., & Otten, S. (2009). Iron ladies, men of steel: The effects of gender stereotyping on the perception of male and female candidates are moderated by prototypicality. European Journal of Social Psychology, 39, 186-195. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.505

  • Lammers, J., Stoker, J. I., & Stapel, D. A. (2009). Differentiating social and personal power: Opposite effects on stereotyping, but parallel effects on behavioral approach tendencies. Psychological Science, 20, 1543-1549. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02479.x

To top of page

2008

  • Glöckner, A. (2008). How evolution outwits bounded rationality: The efficient interaction of automatic and deliberate processes in decision making and implications for institutions. In C. Engel & W. Singer (Eds.), Better than conscious? Decision making, the human mind, and implications for institutions (pp. 259-284). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. [pdf]

  • Glöckner, A., & Betsch, T. (2008). Do people make decisions under risk based on ignorance? An empirical test of the priority heuristic against cumulative prospect theory. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 107, 75-95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2008.02.003

  • Glöckner, A., & Betsch, T. (2008). Modeling option and strategy choices with connectionist networks: Towards an integrative model of automatic and deliberate decision making. Judgment and Decision Making, 3, 215-228. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1930297500002424  

  • Glöckner, A., & Betsch, T. (2008). Multiple-reason decision making based on automatic processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34, 1055-1075.https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.34.5.1055

  • McElreath, R., Boyd, R., Gigerenzer, G., Glöckner, A., Hammerstein, P., Kurzban, R., … Stevens, J. R. (2008). Individual decision making and the evolutionary roots of institutions. In C. Engel & W. Singer (Eds.), Better than conscious? Decision making, the human mind, and implications for institutions (pp. 325-342). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. [pdf]

To top of page

2007

  • Glöckner, A. (2007). Does intuition beat fast and frugal heuristics? A systematic empirical analysis. In H. Plessner, C. Betsch, & T. Betsch (Eds.), Intuition in judgment and decision making (pp. 309-325). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. [pdf]

To top of page

2006

  • Glöckner, A. (2006). Automatische Prozesse bei Entscheidungen. Hamburg, Germany: Kovac.

To top of page

2005

To top of page

2004

  • Betsch, T., Haberstroh, S., Molter, B., & Glöckner, A. (2004). Oops, I did it again—Relapse errors in routinized decision making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 93, 62-74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2003.09.002

To top of page

2003

  • Glöckner, A., & Grüner, K. (2003). Effizientes Online-Verfahren für die Personalentwicklung: 360° Führungsfeedback. Planung & Analyse, 2, 85–90.

To top of page

2002

  • Schubert, T., & Crusius, J. (2002). Five theses on the book problem: Presence in books, film and VR. In F. R. Gouveia & F. Biocca (Eds.), Proceedings of the fifth international workshop on presence (pp. 53–59). Porto, Portugal: Universidad Fernando Pessoa.  [pdf]

To top of page

2001

  • Betsch, T., Haberstroh, S., Glöckner, A., Haar, T., & Fiedler, K. (2001). The effects of routine strength on adaptation and information search in recurrent decision making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 84, 23–53. https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.2000.2916

To top of page

2000

  • Betsch, T., Glöckner, A., & Haberstroh, S. (2000). COMMERCE—A micro-world simulation to study routine maintenance and deviation in repeated decision making. Methods of Psychological Research, 5. [full text]

To top of page