skip to content

Publications

→ Find a selection of the Group Chairs' key publications below.
→ Click on a name to get to the full list of publications of the corresponding group.

  • Unkelbach, C., Alves, H., & Koch, A. (in press). Negativity bias, positivity bias, and valence asymmetries: Explaining the differential processing of positive and negative information. B. Gawronski (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology. Cambridge, MA: Academic Press.
  • Landy, J. F., Jia, M. (L.), Ding, I. L., Viganola, D., Tierney, W., ... Dohle, S., ... Uhlmann, E. L. (2020). Crowdsourcing hypothesis tests: Making transparent how design choices shape research results. Psychological Bulletin, 146(5), 451–479. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000220
  • Unkelbach, C., Koch, A., & Alves, H. (2019). The evaluative information ecology: On the frequency and diversity of “good” and “bad”. European Review of Social Psychology, 30, 216-270.
  • Jekel, M., Glöckner, A., & Bröder, A. (2018). A new and unique prediction for cue-search in a parallel-constraint satisfaction network model: The attraction search effect. Psychological Review, 125, 744–768. https://doi.org/10.1037/rev0000107
  • Baldwin, M., & Lammers, J. (2016). Past-focused environmental comparisons promote proenvironmental outcomes for conservatives. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113, 14953–14957. doi:10.1073/pnas.1610834113
  • Schmittat, S. M., & Englich, B. (2016). If you judge, investigate! Responsibility reduces confirmatory information processing in legal experts. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 22, 386–400. doi:10.1037/law0000097
  • Schneider, I. K., Veenstra, L., van Harreveld, F., Schwarz, N., & Koole, S. L. (2016). Let's not be indifferent about neutrality: Neutral ratings in the International Affective Picture System (IAPS) mask mixed affective responses. Emotion, 16, 426–430. doi:10.1037/emo0000164
  • Schneider, I. K., van Harreveld, F., Rotteveel, M., Topolinski, S., van der Pligt, J., Schwarz, N., & Koole, S. L. (2015). The path of ambivalence: Tracing the pull of opposing evaluations using mouse trajectories. Frontiers in Psychology, 6:996. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00996
  • Genschow, O., Florack, A., & Wänke, M. (2013). The power of movement: Evidence for context-independent movement imitation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 142, 763–773. doi:10.1037/a0029795
  • Imhoff, R., Dotsch, R., Bianchi, M., Banse, R., & Wigboldus, D. H. J. (2011). Facing Europe—Visualizing spontaneous in-group projection. Psychological Science, 22, 1583–1590. doi:10.1177/0956797611419675
  • Unkelbach, C., Fiedler, K., Bayer, M., Stegmüller, M., & Danner, D. (2008). Why positive information is processed faster: The density hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 36–49. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.95.1.36
  • Englich, B., Mussweiler, T., & Strack, F. (2006). Playing dice with criminal sentences: The influence of irrelevant anchors on experts' judicial decision making. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 188-200. doi:10.1177/0146167205282152