In press | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008

In press

• Stoker, J.I., Garretsen, H., & Lammers, J. (in press). Leading and working from home in times of COVID-19: On the perceived changes in leadership behaviors. Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies.

• Fleischmann, A. & Van Berkel, L. (in press). Gender disparities in middle authorship. Social Psychological Bulletin.

2022

• Mousavi, D., Schulte, A., & Lammers, J. (2022). Stressing the advantages of female leadership can place women at a disadvantage: A replication and extension of Lammers and Gast (2017). Social Psychology, 53(4), 257–262. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000491

2021

• Ecker, Y., Imhoff, R., & Lammers, J. (2021). Self-control failure increases a strategic preference for submission as means to avoid future failure. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 

• Lammers, J., & Imhoff, R. (2021). A chronic lack of perceived low personal control increases women and men’s self-reported preference for high-status characteristics when selecting romantic partners in simulated dating situations. Social Psychological and Personality Science.

• Fleischmann, A., Lammers, J., Diel, K., Hofmann, W., & Galinsky, A. D. (2021). More threatening and more diagnostic: How moral comparisons differ from social comparisons. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000361

• Lammers, J., Pauels, E., Fleischman, A., & Galinsky, A. D. (2021). Why people hate congress but love their own congressperson: An information processing explanation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin.

• Lammers, J., & Baldwin, M. (2021). Two sides of the same coin: A new look at differences and similarities across political ideology. Cambridge handbook of political psychology.

• Brandt, M. J., Kuppens, T., Spears, R., Andrighetto, L., Autin, F., Babincak, P., ... Lammers, J., …, Zimmerman, J. L. (2021). Subjective status and perceived legitimacy across countries. European Journal of Social Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2694

• Lammers, J., & Baldwin, M. (2021). Make America gracious again: Collective nostalgia can increase and decrease support for right-wing populist rhetoric. European Journal of Social Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2673

2020

• Fleischmann, A., Lammers, J., Conway, P., & Galinsky, A.D. (2020). Kant be compared: People high in social comparison orientation make fewer—not more—deontological decisions in sacrificial dilemmas. Social Psychological and Personality Science. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550620947294

• Sieverding, M., Ungar, N., Fleischmann, A., Lee, M., Zhang, H., Mohnke, M., … Weidner, G. (2020). Prevalence and frequency of self-management strategies among female cancer survivors: The neglected roles of social relations and conscious living. Supportive Care in Cancer, 28, 607-616. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-019-04790-5

• Lammers, J., Crusius, J., & Gast, A. (2020). Correcting misperceptions of exponential coronavirus growth increases support for social distancing. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(28), 16264 - 16266. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2006048117 [data on OSF]

• Fleischmann, A., & Burgmer, P. (2020). Abstract thinking increases support for affirmative action. Sex Roles, 82, 493-511. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-019-01068-2  

• Fleischmann, A., & Lammers, J. (2020). Power and moral thinking. Current Opinion in Psychology, 33, 23-27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2019.06.008  

2019

• Lammers, J., & Burgmer, P. (2019). Power increases the self-serving bias in the attribution of collective successes and failures. European Journal of Social Psychology, 49(5), 1087-1096. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2556  [data and materials on OSF]

• Meijs, M. H. J., Ratliff, K. A., & Lammers, J. (2019). Perceptions of feminist beliefs influence ratings of warmth and competence. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 22(2), 253-270. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1368430217733115  [data and materials on OSF]

• Fleischmann, A., & Gast, A. (Eds.) (2019). Männer können nicht zuhören, Frauen können nicht einparken? Psychologische Forschung zu Geschlechterunterschieden und -stereotypen [Men don’t listen, women cannot park? Psychological research about gender differences and stereotypes] [Special Issue]. Das In-Mind Magazin, 10 (1).

• Fleischmann, A., Lammers, J., Conway, P., & Galinsky, A. D. (2019). Paradoxical effects of power on moral thinking: Why power both increases and decreases deontological and utilitarian moral decisions. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 10, 110-120. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550617744022  [data and materials on OSF]

• Fleischmann, A., Lammers, J., Stoker, J. I., & Garretsen, H. (2019). You can leave your glasses on: Glasses can increase electoral success. Social Psychology, 50, 38-52. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000359  [data and materials on OSF]

• Lammers, J., & Stoker, J. I. (2019). Power affects sexual assertiveness and sexual esteem equally in women and men. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 48, 645–652. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-018-1285-5  [data on OSF]

2018

• Lammers, J., & Baldwin, M. (2018). Past-focused temporal communication overcomes conservatives' resistance to liberal political ideas. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 114, 599-619. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000121  [data on OSF]

• Lammers, J., Gast, A., Unkelbach, C., & Galinsky, A. D. (2018). Moral character impression formation depends on the valence homogeneity of the context. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 9, 576-585. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550617714585  [data on OSF]

2017

• Guinote, A., & Lammers, J. (2017). Accentuation of tending and befriending among the powerless. In M. Bukowski, I. Fritsche, A. Guinote, & M. Kofta (Eds.), Coping with lack of control in a social world (pp. 185–202). New York, NY: Routledge.

• Lammers, J., & Burgmer, P. (2017). Power increases anchoring effects on judgment. Social Cognition, 35, 40–53. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2017.35.1.40  [data on OSF]

• Lammers, J., Dubois, D., Rucker, D. D., & Galinsky, A. D. (2017). Ease of retrieval moderates the effects of power: Implications for the replicability of power recall effects. Social Cognition, 35, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2017.35.1.1  [data on OSF]

• Lammers, J., & Gast, A. (2017). Stressing the advantages of female leadership can place women at a disadvantage. Social Psychology, 48, 28–39. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000292  [data on OSF]

• Lammers, J., Koch, A., Conway, P., & Brandt, M. J. (2017). The political domain appears simpler to the politically extreme than to political moderates. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 8, 612-622. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550616678456  [data on OSF]

• Leach, S., Weick, M., & Lammers, J. (2017). Does influence beget autonomy? Clarifying the relationship between social and personal power. Journal of Theoretical Social Psychology, 1, 5–14. https://doi.org/10.1002/jts5.5

• Meijs, M. H. J., Ratliff, K. A., & Lammers, J. (2017). The discrepancy between how women see themselves and feminists predicts identification with feminism. Sex Roles, 77, 293–308. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-016-0733-8

2016

• Baldwin, M., & Lammers, J. (2016). Past-focused environmental comparisons promote proenvironmental outcomes for conservatives. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113, 14953–14957. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1610834113

• Fleischmann, A., Sieverding, M., Hespenheide, U., Weiß, M., & Koch, S. C. (2016). See feminine – Think incompetent? The effects of a feminine outfit on the evaluation of women’s computer competence. Computers & Education, 95, 63–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.12.007

• Lammers, J., & Imhoff, R. (2016). Power and sadomasochism: Understanding the antecedents of a knotty relationship. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 7, 142–148. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550615604452

• Lammers, J., & Maner, J. (2016). Power and attraction to the counternormative aspects of infidelity. The Journal of Sex Research, 53, 54–63. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2014.989483

• Lammers, J., Stoker, J. I., Rink, F., & Galinsky, A. D. (2016). To have control over or to be free from others? The desire for power reflects a need for autonomy. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 42, 498–512. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167216634064  [data on OSF]

2015

• De Waal-Andrews, W., Gregg, A. P., & Lammers, J. (2015). When status is grabbed and when status is granted: Getting ahead in dominance and prestige hierarchies. British Journal of Social Psychology, 54, 445–464. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12093

• Fleischmann, A., & Sieverding, M. (2015). Reactions toward men who have taken parental leave: Does the length of parental leave matter? Sex Roles, 72, 462-476. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-015-0469-x

• Inbar, Y., & Lammers, J. (2015). Increasing ideological tolerance in social psychology [Peer commentary on “Political diversity will improve social psychological science” by J. L. Duarte et al.]. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 38, e147. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X1400123X

• Lammers, J., Galinsky, A. D., Dubois, D., & Rucker, D. D. (2015). Power and morality. Current Opinion in Psychology, 6, 15–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2015.03.018

• Meijs, M. H. J., Lammers, J., & Ratliff, K. A. (2015). Gender stereotype-inconsistent acts are seen as more acceptable than stereotype-consistent acts, if they are clever. Social Psychology, 46, 291–305. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000244  [data and materials on OSF]

2014

• Inbar, Y., & Lammers, J. (2014). Political diversity in social psychology: Problems and solutions. In P. Valdesolo & J. Graham (Eds.), Bridging ideological divides, Claremont symposium on applied social psychology.

• Lammers, J., & Van Beest, I. (2014). The effects of power on immorality. In J.-W. Van Prooijen & P. A. M. Van Lange (Eds.), Power, politics, and paranoia: Why people are suspicious of their leaders (pp. 17–32). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

2013

• Çelik, P., Lammers, J., van Beest, I., Bekker, M. H. J., & Vonk, R. (2013). Not all rejections are alike: Competence and warmth as a fundamental distinction in social rejection. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49, 635–642. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2013.02.010

• Çelik, P., van Beest, I., Lammers, J., & Bekker, M. (2013). Implicit threat vigilance among violent offenders diagnosed with antisocial personality disorder: The impact of ostracism and control threat. International Journal of Developmental Science, 7, 47–55.

• Lammers, J., Dubois, D., Rucker, D. D., & Galinsky, A. D. (2013). Power gets the job: Priming power improves interview outcomes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49, 776–779. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2013.02.008

• Lammers, J., & Proulx, T. (2013). Writing autobiographical narratives increases political conservatism. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49, 684–691. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2013.03.008

• Latu, I. M., Mast, M. S., Lammers, J., & Bombari, D. (2013). Successful female leaders empower women’s behavior in leadership tasks. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49, 444–448. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2013.01.003

2012

• Inbar, Y., & Lammers, J. (2012). Ideological diversity in social and personality psychology: questions and answers. SPSP Dialogue. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2167052

• Inbar, Y., & Lammers, J. (2012). Political diversity in social and personality psychology. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7, 496–503. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612448792

• Johnson, C. S., & Lammers, J. (2012). The powerful disregard social comparison information. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48, 329–334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2011.10.010

• Lammers, J. (2012). Abstraction increases hypocrisy. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48, 475–480. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2011.07.006

• Lammers, J., Galinsky, A. D., Gordijn, E. H., & Otten, S. (2012). Power increases social distance. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 3, 282–290. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550611418679

• Lammers, J., & Yang, H. (2012). Feelings of power lead people to take sides with other powerful parties. Revista de Psicología Social, 27, 337–346. https://doi.org/10.1174/021347412802845612

• Stoker, J. I., Van der Velde, M., & Lammers, J. (2012). Factors relating to managerial stereotypes: The role of gender of the employee and the manager and management gender ratio. Journal of Business and Psychology, 27, 31–42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-011-9210-0

2011

• Galinsky, A. D., Rus, D., & Lammers, J. (2011). Power: A central force governing psychological, social, and organizational life. In D. De Cremer, R. van Dick, & J. K. Murnighan (Eds.), Social psychology and organizations (pp. 17–38). New York, NY: Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.

• Lammers, J., & Gast, A. (2011). Power in the House. In T. V. Cascio & L. M. Martin (Eds.), House and psychology: Humanity is overrated. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

• Lammers, J., & Stapel, D. A. (2011). Power increases dehumanization. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 14, 113–126. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430210370042

• Lammers, J., Stoker, J. I., Jordan, J., Pollmann, M., & Stapel, D. A. (2011). Power increases infidelity among men and women. Psychological Science, 22, 1191–1197. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611416252

2010

• Lammers, J., Stapel, D. A., & Galinsky, A. D. (2010). Power increases hypocrisy: Moralizing in reasoning, immorality in behavior. Psychological Science, 21, 737–744. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797610368810

• Lammers, J., Stoker, J. I., & Stapel, D. A. (2010). Power and behavioral approach orientation in existing power relations and the mediating effect of income. European Journal of Social Psychology, 40, 543–551. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.702

2009

• Lammers, J., & Galinsky, A. D. (2009). The conceptualization of power and the nature of interdependency: The role of legitimacy and culture. In D. Tjosvold & B. Wisse (Eds.), Power and interdependence in organizations (pp. 67–82). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

• Lammers, J., Gordijn, E. H., & Otten, S. (2009). Iron ladies, men of steel: The effects of gender stereotyping on the perception of male and female candidates are moderated by prototypicality. European Journal of Social Psychology, 39, 186–195. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.505

• Lammers, J., & Stapel, D. A. (2009). How power influences moral thinking. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 279–289. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015437

• Lammers, J., Stoker, J. I., & Stapel, D. A. (2009). Differentiating social and personal power: Opposite effects on stereotyping, but parallel effects on behavioral approach tendencies. Psychological Science, 20, 1543–1549. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02479.x

2008

• Lammers, J., Galinsky, A. D., Gordijn, E. H., & Otten, S. (2008). Illegitimacy moderates the effects of power on approach. Psychological Science, 19, 558–564. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02123.x

• Lammers, J., Gordijn, E. H., & Otten, S. (2008). Looking through the eyes of the powerful. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 1229–1238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2008.03.015