skip to content

Glöckner Group | Publications

In press | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2000

Please contact socc-coSpamProtectionuni-koeln.de if you cannot gain access to publications otherwise.

In press

  • Dorrough, A., & Glöckner, A. (in press). A cross-national analysis of sex differences in prisoner's dilemma games. British Journal of Social Psychology.  [data and materials on OSF]
  • Fleischmann, A., & Lammers, J. (in press). Power and moral thinking. Current Opinion in Psychology.
  • Glöckner, A. (in press). Der Mensch im Spannungsfeld zwischen (begrenzter) Rationalität, Eigeninteresse und Kooperation: Welches Wesen adressiert das Recht? In A. Funke & U. Schmalke (Eds.), Menschenbilder im Recht.
  • Glöckner, A., & Jekel, M. (in press). Testing cognitive models by a joint analysis of multiple dependent measures. In M. Schulte-Mecklenbeck et al. (Eds.), Handbook of Process Tracing.
  • Jekel, M. (in press). Empirical content as a criterion for evaluating models. Cognitive Processing.
  • Mischkowski, D., Stone, R., & Stremitzer, A. (in press). Promises, expectations, and social cooperation. The Journal of Law and Economics.
  • Nett, T., Dorrough, A. R., Jekel, M., & Glöckner, A. (in press). Perceived biological and social characteristics of a representative set of German first names. Journal of Social Psychology.  [data and materials on OSF]
  • Posten, A.-C., & Mussweiler, T. (in press). Egocentric foundations of trust. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology.

To top

2019

To top

2018

  • Betsch, T., Lehmann, A., Jekel, M., Lindow, S., & Glöckner, A. (2018). Children's application of decision strategies in a compensatory environment. Judgment and Decision Making, 13, 514–528.  [pdf]  [data]
  • Fiedler, S., Hellmann, D. M., Dorrough, A., & Glöckner, A. (2018). Cross-national in-group favoritism in prosocial behavior: Evidence from Latin and North America. Judgment and Decision Making, 13, 42-60.  [pdf]  [data and materials on OSF]
  • Glöckner, A., Fiedler, S., & Renkewitz, F. (2018). Belastbare und effiziente Wissenschaft: Strategische Ausrichtung von Forschungsprozessen als Weg aus der Replikationskrise. Psychologische Rundschau, 69, 22–36. https://doi.org/10.1026/0033-3042/a000384
  • Jekel, M., & Glöckner, A. (2018). How to identify strategy use and adaptive strategy selection: The crucial role of chance correction in weighted compensatory strategies. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 31, 265–279. https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.1983
  • Jekel, M., & Glöckner, A. (2018). Meaningful model comparisons have to include reasonable competing models and also all data: A rejoinder to Rieskamp (2018). Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 31, 289–293. https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.2076
  • Lammers, J., & Baldwin, M. (2018). Past-focused temporal communication overcomes conservatives' resistance to liberal political ideas. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 114, 599-619. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000121  [data on OSF]
  • Lammers, J., Gast, A., Unkelbach, C., & Galinsky, A. D. (2018). Moral character impression formation depends on the valence homogeneity of the context. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 9, 576-585. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550617714585  [data on OSF]
  • Lange, J., Blatz, L., & Crusius, J. (2018). Dispositional envy: A conceptual review. In V. Zeigler-Hill & T. K. Shackelford (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of personality and individual differences. Volume III: Applications of personality and individual differences (pp. 424–439). London, UK: SAGE. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781526451248  [pdf]
  • Marewski, J. N., Bröder, A., & Glöckner, A. (2018). Some metatheoretical reflections on adaptive decision making and the strategy selection problem. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 31, 181–198. https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.2075
  • McCarthy, R. J., Skowronski, J. J., Verschuere, B., Meijer, E. H., Jim, A., Hoogesteyn, K., … Blatz, L., … Crusius, J., … Yıldız, E. (2018). Registered Replication Report on Srull and Wyer (1979). Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1, 321–336. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918777487  [data and materials on OSF]
  • Mischkowski, D., Glöckner, A., & Lewisch, P. (2018). From spontaneous cooperation to spontaneous punishment – Distinguishing the underlying motives driving spontaneous behavior in first and second order public good games. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 149, 59–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2018.07.001  [data and materials on OSF]
  • Posten, A.-C., & Steinmetz, J. (2018). Temperatur und Zustimmung - ein bisher unbekannter Zusammenhang. Einblicke für Praxis und Forschung. Praxis Der Rechtspsychologie, 2, 137-152.
  • Steinmetz, J., & Posten, A.-C. (2018). White lies and black lies: What they have in common and how they differ. In-Mind Magazine.  [full text]
  • Stürmer, S., Christ, O., Jonkmann, K., Josephs, I., Gaschler, R., Glöckner, A., … Salewski, C. (2018). 10 Jahre universitäres Fernstudium in Psychologie an der FernUniversität in Hagen. Psychologische Rundschau, 69, 104–108. https://doi.org/10.1026/0033-3042/a000400
  • Towfigh, E. V., Traxler, C., & Glöckner, A. (2018). Geschlechts- und Herkunftseffekte bei der Benotung juristischer Staatsprüfungen. Zeitschrift Für Didaktik Der Rechtswissenschaft, 5, 115–142.
  • Verschuere, B., Meijer, E. H., Jim, A., Hoogesteyn, K., Orthey, R., McCarthy, R. J., … Blatz, L., … Crusius, J., … Yıldız, E (2018). Registered Replication Report on Mazar, Amir, and Ariely (2008). Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1, 299–317. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918781032  [data and materials on OSF]

To top

2017

  • Amit, E., Koralnik, J., Posten, A.-C., Muethel, M., & Lessig, L. (2017). Institutional corruption revisited: Exploring open questions within the institutional corruption literature. Southern California Interdisciplinary Law Journal, 26, 447–595.
  • Bouwmeester, S., Verkoeijen, P. P. J. L., Aczel, B., Barbosa, F., Bègue, L., Brañas-Garza, P., … Glöckner, A., … Mischkowski, D., … Wollbrant, C. E. (2017). Registered Replication Report: Rand, Greene, and Nowak (2012). Perspectives on Psychological Science, 12, 527–542. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691617693624  [data and materials on OSF]
  • Crusius*, J., & Lange*, J. (2017). How do people respond to threatened social status? Moderators of benign versus malicious envy. In R. H. Smith, U. Merlone, & M. K. Duffy (Eds.), Envy at work and in organizations (pp. 85–110). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.  [pdf]  * shared first authorship
  • Guinote, A., & Lammers, J. (2017). Accentuation of tending and befriending among the powerless. In M. Bukowski, I. Fritsche, A. Guinote, & M. Kofta (Eds.), Coping with lack of control in a social world (pp. 185–202). New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Lammers, J., Koch, A., Conway, P., & Brandt, M. J. (2017). The political domain appears simpler to the politically extreme than to political moderates. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 8, 612-622. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550616678456  [data on OSF]
  • Leach, S., Weick, M., & Lammers, J. (2017). Does influence beget autonomy? Clarifying the relationship between social and personal power. Journal of Theoretical Social Psychology, 1, 5–14. https://doi.org/10.1002/jts5.5
  • Meijs, M. H. J., Ratliff, K. A., & Lammers, J. (2017). The discrepancy between how women see themselves and feminists predicts identification with feminism. Sex Roles, 77, 293–308. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-016-0733-8
  • Steinmetz*, J., & Posten*, A.-C. (2017). Physical temperature affects response behavior. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 70, 294–300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2016.12.001 * shared first authorship

To top

2016

  • Ashby, N. J. S., Jekel, M., Dickert, S., & Glöckner, A. (2016). Finding the right fit: A comparison of process assumptions underlying popular drift-diffusion models. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 42, 1982–1993. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000279
  • Baldwin, M., & Lammers, J. (2016). Past-focused environmental comparisons promote proenvironmental outcomes for conservatives. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113, 14953–14957. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1610834113
  • Corcoran, K., & Crusius, J. (2016). Sozialer Vergleich [Social comparison]. In D. Frey & H.-W. Bierhoff (Eds.), Sozialpsychologie - Soziale Motive und Soziale Einstellungen [Social psychology—Social motives and social attitudes], Enzyklopädie der Psychologie (Vol. C/VI/2, pp. 87-106). Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe.  [pdf]
  • Fleischmann, A., Sieverding, M., Hespenheide, U., Weiß, M., & Koch, S. C. (2016). See feminine – Think incompetent? The effects of a feminine outfit on the evaluation of women’s computer competence. Computers & Education, 95, 63–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.12.007
  • Glöckner, A. (2016). The irrational hungry judge effect revisited: Simulations reveal that the magnitude of the effect is overestimated. Judgment and Decision Making, 11, 601–610.  [pdf]
  • Glöckner, A., Hilbig, B. E., Henninger, F., & Fiedler, S. (2016). The reversed description-experience gap: Disentangling sources of presentation format effects in risky choice. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 145, 486–508. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0040103  [data and materials on OSF]
  • Glöckner, A., & Towfigh, E. V. (2016). Messgenauigkeit und Fairness in Staatsprüfungen: Aktuelle Studien zeigen Gruppen-Unterschiede in juristischen Examina auf. Anwaltsblatt, 10, 706–709.
  • Lammers, J., & Imhoff, R. (2016). Power and sadomasochism: Understanding the antecedents of a knotty relationship. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 7, 142–148. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550615604452
  • Lammers, J., Stoker, J. I., Rink, F., & Galinsky, A. D. (2016). To have control over or to be free from others? The desire for power reflects a need for autonomy. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 42, 498–512. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167216634064  [data on OSF]
  • Seithe, M., Morina, J., & Glöckner, A. (2016). Bonn eXperimental System (BoXS): An open-source platform for interactive experiments in psychology and economics. Behavior Research Methods, 48, 1454–1475. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-015-0660-6
  • Towfigh, E. V., Goerg, S. J., Glöckner, A., Leifeld, P., Llorente-Saguer, A., Bade, S., & Kurschilgen, C. (2016). Do direct-democratic procedures lead to higher acceptance than political representation? Experimental survey evidence from Germany. Public Choice, 167, 47–65. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-016-0330-y

To top

2015

  • Appel, H., Crusius, J., & Gerlach, A. (2015). Social comparison, envy, and depression on Facebook: A study looking at the effects of high comparison standards on depressed individuals. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 34, 277-289. https://doi.org/10.1521/jscp.2015.34.4.277  [pdf]
  • Ashby, N. J. S., Walasek, L., & Glöckner, A. (2015). The effect of consumer ratings and attentional allocation on product valuations. Judgment and Decision Making, 10, 172–184.  [pdf]  [data and materials]
  • Crusius, J., & Lange, J. (2015). Envy. In M. Altman (Ed.), Real world decision making: An encyclopaedia of behavioral economics (pp. 122-123). Santa Barbara, CA: Greenwood.  [pdf]
  • De Waal-Andrews, W., Gregg, A. P., & Lammers, J. (2015). When status is grabbed and when status is granted: Getting ahead in dominance and prestige hierarchies. British Journal of Social Psychology, 54, 445–464. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12093
  • Glöckner, A., Tontrup, S., & Bechtold, S. (2015). Disentangling psychological sources of overpricing in anticommons dilemmas: Strategic incentives, endowment effects, and interdependence of outcomes. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 28, 224–238. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bdm.1839  [data and materials on OSF]
  • Glöckner, A., & Towfigh, E. V. (2015). Entscheidungen zwischen „Intuition“ und „Rationalität“. Deutsche Richterzeitung, 7/8, 14–17.
  • Inbar, Y., & Lammers, J. (2015). Increasing ideological tolerance in social psychology [Peer commentary on “Political diversity will improve social psychological science” by J. L. Duarte et al.]. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 38, e147. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X1400123X
  • Morell, A., Glöckner, A., & Towfigh, E. V. (2015). Sticky rebates: Loyalty rebates impede rational switching of consumers. Journal of Competition Law & Economics, 11, 431–461. https://doi.org/10.1093/joclec/nhv009

To top

2014

  • Corcoran, K., & Crusius, J. (2014). Warum sozialpsychologische Forschung für die Rechtswissenschaften von Interesse ist [Why social psychological research is of interest for law]. Austrian Law Journal, 1, 40–47.  [pdf]
  • Engel, C., Beckenkamp, M., Glöckner, A., Irlenbusch, B., Hennig-Schmidt, H., Kube, S., … Towfigh, E. (2014). First impressions are more important than early intervention: Qualifying Broken Windows Theory in the lab. International Review of Law and Economics, 37, 126–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irle.2013.07.005
  • Glöckner, A., & Bröder, A. (2014). Cognitive integration of recognition information and additional cues in memory-based decisions. Judgment and Decision Making, 9, 35–50.  [pdf]  [data]
  • Hilbig, B. E., Glöckner, A., & Zettler, I. (2014). Personality and prosocial behavior: Linking basic traits and social value orientations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 107, 529–539. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036074
  • Inbar, Y., & Lammers, J. (2014). Political diversity in social psychology: Problems and solutions. In P. Valdesolo & J. Graham (Eds.), Bridging ideological divides, Claremont symposium on applied social psychology.
  • Jekel, M., Glöckner, A., Bröder, A., & Maydych, V. (2014). Approximating rationality under incomplete information: Adaptive inferences for missing cue values based on cue-discrimination. Judgment and Decision Making, 9, 129–147.  [pdf]  [data and materials]
  • Lammers, J., & Van Beest, I. (2014). The effects of power on immorality. In J.-W. Van Prooijen & P. A. M. Van Lange (Eds.), Power, politics, and paranoia: Why people are suspicious of their leaders (pp. 17–32). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Posten, A.-C., Ockenfels, A., & Mussweiler, T. (2014). How activating cognitive content shapes trust: A subliminal priming study. Journal of Economic Psychology, 41, 12–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2013.04.002
  • Söllner, A., Bröder, A., Glöckner, A., & Betsch, T. (2014). Single-process versus multiple-strategy models of decision making: Evidence from an information intrusion paradigm. Acta Psychologica, 146, 84–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2013.12.007
  • Towfigh, E. V., Traxler, C., & Glöckner, A. (2014). Zur Benotung in der Examensvorbereitung und im ersten Examen: eine empirische Analyse. Zeitschrift für Didaktik der Rechtswissenschaft, 1, 8–27.

To top

2013

  • Bröder, A., Glöckner, A., Betsch, T., Link, D., & Ettlin, F. (2013). Do people learn option or strategy routines in multi-attribute decisions? The answer depends on subtle factors. Acta Psychologica, 143, 200–209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2013.03.005
  • Çelik, P., Lammers, J., van Beest, I., Bekker, M. H. J., & Vonk, R. (2013). Not all rejections are alike: Competence and warmth as a fundamental distinction in social rejection. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49, 635–642. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2013.02.010
  • Çelik, P., van Beest, I., Lammers, J., & Bekker, M. (2013). Implicit threat vigilance among violent offenders diagnosed with antisocial personality disorder: The impact of ostracism and control threat. International Journal of Developmental Science, 7, 47–55.
  • Crusius, J., & Mussweiler, T. (2013). Untangling envy. The feeling can help us even when it hurts. Scientific American Mind, 24, 35–37.  [pdf]
  • Engel, C., & Glöckner, A. (2013). Role-induced bias in court: An experimental analysis. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 26, 272–284. https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.1761
  • Fiedler, S., Glöckner, A., Nicklisch, A., & Dickert, S. (2013). Social Value Orientation and information search in social dilemmas: An eye-tracking analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 120, 272–284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2012.07.002
  • Glöckner, A., & Engel, C. (2013). Can we trust intuitive jurors? Standards of proof and the probative value of evidence in coherence-based reasoning. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 10, 230–252. https://doi.org/10.1111/jels.12009
  • Lammers, J., Dubois, D., Rucker, D. D., & Galinsky, A. D. (2013). Power gets the job: Priming power improves interview outcomes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49, 776–779. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2013.02.008
  • Latu, I. M., Mast, M. S., Lammers, J., & Bombari, D. (2013). Successful female leaders empower women’s behavior in leadership tasks. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49, 444–448. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2013.01.003
  • Posten, A.-C., & Mussweiler, T. (2013). When distrust frees your mind: The stereotype-reducing effects of distrust. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 105, 567–584. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0033170
  • Towfigh, E. V., Glöckner, A., & Reid, R. (2013). Dangerous games: The psychological case for regulating gambling. Charleston Law Review, 8, 148–189.

To top

2012

  • Ashby, N. J. S., Dickert, S., & Glöckner, A. (2012). Focusing on what you own: Biased information uptake due to ownership. Judgment and Decision Making, 7, 254–267.  [pdf]  [data]
  • Crusius, J., & Mussweiler, T. (2012). Des einen Freud, des anderen ... Gehirn&Geist, 10, 18–23.  [pdf]
  • Crusius, J., & Mussweiler, T. (2012). Social comparison in negotiation. In G. E. Bolton & R. T. A. Croson (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of economic conflict resolution (pp. 120–137). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.  [pdf]
  • Crusius, J., & Mussweiler, T. (2012). To achieve or not to achieve? Comparative mindsets elicit assimilation and contrast in goal priming. European Journal of Social Psychology, 42, 780–788. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.873  [pdf]
  • Dickert, S., Herbig, B., Glöckner, A., Gansen, C., & Portack, R. (2012). The more the better? Effects of training, experience and information amount in legal judgments. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 26, 223–233. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1813
  • Fiedler, S., Glöckner, A., & Nicklisch, A. (2012). The influence of Social Value Orientation on information processing in repeated Voluntary Contribution Mechanism games: An eye-tracking analysis. In A. Innocenti & A. Sirigu (Eds.), Neuroscience and the economics of decision making. New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Glöckner, A., Fiedler, S., Hochman, G., Ayal, S., & Hilbig, B. E. (2012). Processing differences between descriptions and experience: A comparative analysis using eye-tracking and physiological measures. Frontiers in Psychology, 3:173. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00173
  • Glöckner, A., & Hilbig, B. E. (2012). Risk is relative: Risk aversion yields cooperation rather than defection in cooperation-friendly environments. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 19, 546–553. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-012-0224-z
  • Gollwitzer, M., Rothmund, T., Alt, B., & Jekel, M. (2012). Victim sensitivity and the accuracy of social judgments. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38, 975–984. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167212440887
  • Mussweiler, T., Todd, A. R., & Crusius, J. (2012). The cognitive underpinnings of social behavior: Selectivity in social cognition. In P. Hammerstein & J. R. Stevens (Eds.), Strüngmann Forum Reports: Vol. 11. Evolution and the mechanisms of decision making (pp. 275–286). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.  [pdf]
  • Stoker, J. I., Van der Velde, M., & Lammers, J. (2012). Factors relating to managerial stereotypes: The role of gender of the employee and the manager and management gender ratio. Journal of Business and Psychology, 27, 31–42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-011-9210-0

To top

2011

  • Ashby, N. J. S., Glöckner, A., & Dickert, S. (2011). Conscious and unconscious thought in risky choice: Testing the capacity principle and the appropriate weighting principle of Unconscious Thought Theory. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, 261. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00261
  • Corcoran, K., Crusius, J., & Mussweiler, T. (2011). Social comparison: Motives, standards, and mechanisms. In D. Chadee (Ed.), Theories in social psychology (pp. 119–139). Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.  [pdf]
  • Galinsky, A. D., Rus, D., & Lammers, J. (2011). Power: A central force governing psychological, social, and organizational life. In D. De Cremer, R. van Dick, & J. K. Murnighan (Eds.), Social psychology and organizations (pp. 17–38). New York, NY: Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.
  • Glöckner, A., & Betsch, T. (2011). The empirical content of theories in judgment and decision making: Shortcomings and remedies. Judgment and Decision Making, 6, 711–721.  [pdf]
  • Glöckner, A., & Bröder, A. (2011). Processing of recognition information and additional cues: A model-based analysis of choice, confidence, and response time. Judgment and Decision Making, 6, 23–42.  [pdf]
  • Glöckner, A., & Ebert, I. D. (2011). Legal intuition and expertise. In M. Sinclair (Ed.), Handbook of intuition research (pp. 157–167). Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing.
  • Glöckner, A., & Herbold, A.-K. (2011). An eye-tracking study on information processing in risky decisions: Evidence for compensatory strategies based on automatic processes. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 24, 71–98.
  • Glöckner, A., & Hilbig, B. E. (2011). Editorial: Methodology in judgment and decision making research. Judgment and Decision Making, 6, 705–710.  [pdf]
  • Glöckner, A., & Hochman, G. (2011). The interplay of experience-based affective and probabilistic cues in decision making. Experimental Psychology, 58, 132–141. https://doi.org/10.1027/1618-3169/a000078
  • Glöckner, A., Irlenbusch, B., Kube, S., Nicklisch, A., & Normann, H.-T. (2011). Leading with(out) sacrifice? A public-goods experiment with a privileged player. Economic Inquiry, 49, 591–597. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-7295.2010.00314.x
  • Glöckner, A., & Landsberg, M. (2011). Der Schöffe entscheidet: Eine empirische Studie zum Entscheidungsverhalten von Schöffen. Richter ohne Robe, 23, 44–47.
  • Hilbig, B. E., & Glöckner, A. (2011). Yes, they can! Appropriate weighting of small probabilities as a function of information acquisition. Acta Psychologica, 138, 390–396. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2011.09.005
  • Jekel, M., Fiedler, S., & Glöckner, A. (2011). Diagnostic task selection for strategy classification in judgment and decision making: Theory, validation, and implementation in R. Judgment and Decision Making, 6, 782–799.  [pdf]  [materials]
  • Lammers, J., & Gast, A. (2011). Power in the House. In T. V. Cascio & L. M. Martin (Eds.), House and psychology: Humanity is overrated. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
  • Lammers, J., Stoker, J. I., Jordan, J., Pollmann, M., & Stapel, D. A. (2011). Power increases infidelity among men and women. Psychological Science, 22, 1191–1197. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611416252
  • Mischkowski, D., & Klauk, B. (2011). Narcissists as risk factors for companies. Psychology and empiricism of the Narcissistic Personality Disorder. Personalführung, 2, 16–24.
  • Towfigh, E. V., & Glöckner, A. (2011). Game over: Empirical support for soccer bets regulation. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 17, 475–506.

To top

2010

  • Engel, C., Glöckner, A., & Schönfeldt, K. (2010). Informationsverzerrungen bei rechtlichen Entscheidungen. Richter ohne Robe, 22, 135–136.
  • Glöckner, A. (2010). Multiple measure strategy classification: Outcomes, decision times and confidence ratings. In A. Glöckner & C. L. M. Witteman (Eds.), Foundations for tracing intuition: Challenges and methods (pp. 83–105). London, UK: Psychology Press & Routledge.
  • Glöckner, A., & Betsch, T. (2010). Accounting for critical evidence while being precise and avoiding the strategy selection problem in a parallel constraint satisfaction approach: A reply to Marewski (2010). Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 23, 468–472.
  • Glöckner, A., Betsch, T., & Schindler, N. (2010). Coherence shifts in probabilistic inference tasks. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 23, 439–462.
  • Glöckner, A., & Witteman, C. L. M. (2010). Beyond dual-process models: A categorisation of processes underlying intuitive judgement and decision making. Thinking & Reasoning, 16, 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/13546780903395748
  • Glöckner, A., & Witteman, C. L. M. (2010). Foundations for tracing intuition: Challenges and methods. London, UK: Psychology Press & Routledge.
  • Glöckner, A., & Witteman, C. L. M. (2010). Foundations for tracing intuition: Models, findings, categorizations. In A. Glöckner & C. L. M. Witteman (Eds.), Foundations for tracing intuition: Challenges and methods (pp. 1–23). London, UK: Psychology Press & Routledge.
  • Hanko, K., Crusius, J., & Mussweiler, T. (2010). When I and me are different: Assimilation and contrast in temporal self-comparisons. European Journal of Social Psychology, 40, 160–168. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.625  [pdf]
  • Hochman, G., Ayal, S., & Glöckner, A. (2010). Physiological arousal in processing recognition information: Ignoring or integrating cognitive cues? Judgment and Decision Making, 5, 285–299.  [pdf]
  • Hochman, G., Glöckner, A., & Yechiam, E. (2010). Physiological measures in identifying decision strategies. In A. Glöckner & C. L. M. Witteman (Eds.), Foundations for tracing intuition: Challenges and methods (pp. 139–159). London, UK: Psychology Press & Routledge.
  • Jekel, M., Nicklisch, A., & Glöckner, A. (2010). Implementation of the Multiple-Measure Maximum Likelihood strategy classification method in R: Addendum to Glöckner (2009) and practical guide for application. Judgment and Decision Making, 5, 54–63.  [pdf]  [data and materials]
  • Lammers, J., Stapel, D. A., & Galinsky, A. D. (2010). Power increases hypocrisy: Moralizing in reasoning, immorality in behavior. Psychological Science, 21, 737–744. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797610368810
  • Lammers, J., Stoker, J. I., & Stapel, D. A. (2010). Power and behavioral approach orientation in existing power relations and the mediating effect of income. European Journal of Social Psychology, 40, 543–551. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.702
  • Witteman, C. L. M., & Glöckner, A. (2010). Tracing intuition: Summing up and exemplified method applications. In A. Glöckner & C. L. M. Witteman (Eds.), Foundations for tracing intuition: Challenges and methods (pp. 272–278). London, UK: Psychology Press & Routledge.

To top

2009

  • Glöckner, A. (2009). „Neurorecht“ ohne Psychologie? Die Rolle verhaltenswissenschaftlicher Betrachtungsebenen bei der Ableitung rechtspolitischer Empfehlungen. In S. Schleim, T. M. Spranger, & H. Walter (Eds.), Von der Neuroethik zum Neurorecht? (pp. 104–131). Göttingen, Germany: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.
  • Glöckner, A. (2009). Investigating intuitive and deliberate processes statistically: The multiple-measure maximum likelihood strategy classification method. Judgment and Decision Making, 4, 186–199.  [pdf]  [data and materials]
  • Glöckner, A., & Moritz, S. (2009). A fine-grained analysis of the jumping-to-conclusions bias in schizophrenia: Data-gathering, response confidence, and information integration. Judgment and Decision Making, 4, 587–600.  [pdf]
  • Glöckner, A., & Schönfeldt, K. (2009). Ich überlege. Mein Bauch entscheidet? - Intuition und Entscheidung. Richter ohne Robe, 21, 60–61.
  • Horstmann, N., Ahlgrimm, A., & Glöckner, A. (2009). How distinct are intuition and deliberation? An eye-tracking analysis of instruction-induced decision modes. Judgment and Decision Making, 4, 335–354.  [pdf]
  • Lammers, J., & Galinsky, A. D. (2009). The conceptualization of power and the nature of interdependency: The role of legitimacy and culture. In D. Tjosvold & B. Wisse (Eds.), Power and interdependence in organizations (pp. 67–82). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Lammers, J., Gordijn, E. H., & Otten, S. (2009). Iron ladies, men of steel: The effects of gender stereotyping on the perception of male and female candidates are moderated by prototypicality. European Journal of Social Psychology, 39, 186–195. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.505
  • Lammers, J., & Stapel, D. A. (2009). How power influences moral thinking. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 279–289. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015437
  • Lammers, J., Stoker, J. I., & Stapel, D. A. (2009). Differentiating social and personal power: Opposite effects on stereotyping, but parallel effects on behavioral approach tendencies. Psychological Science, 20, 1543–1549. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02479.x

To top

2008

  • Glöckner, A. (2008). How evolution outwits bounded rationality: The efficient interaction of automatic and deliberate processes in decision making and implications for institutions. In C. Engel & W. Singer (Eds.), Better than conscious? Decision making, the human mind, and implications for institutions (pp. 259–284). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Glöckner, A., & Betsch, T. (2008). Do people make decisions under risk based on ignorance? An empirical test of the priority heuristic against cumulative prospect theory. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 107, 75–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2008.02.003
  • Glöckner, A., & Betsch, T. (2008). Modeling option and strategy choices with connectionist networks: Towards an integrative model of automatic and deliberate decision making. Judgment and Decision Making, 3, 215–228.  [pdf]
  • Glöckner, A., & Betsch, T. (2008). Multiple-reason decision making based on automatic processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34, 1055–1075. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.34.5.1055
  • McElreath, R., Boyd, R., Gigerenzer, G., Glöckner, A., Hammerstein, P., Kurzban, R., … Stevens, J. R. (2008). Individual decision making and the evolutionary roots of institutions. In C. Engel & W. Singer (Eds.), Better than conscious? Decision making, the human mind, and implications for institutions (pp. 325–342). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

To top

2007

  • Glöckner, A. (2007). Does intuition beat fast and frugal heuristics? A systematic empirical analysis. In H. Plessner, C. Betsch, & T. Betsch (Eds.), Intuition in judgment and decision making (pp. 309–325). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

To top

2006

  • Glöckner, A. (2006). Automatische Prozesse bei Entscheidungen. Hamburg, Germany: Kovac.

To top

2005

  • Haberstroh, S., Betsch, T., Glöckner, A., Haar, T., & Stiller, A. (2005). The impact of routines on deliberate decisions: The microworld-simulation COMMERCE. In T. Betsch & S. Haberstroh (Eds.), The routines of decision making (pp. 211–229). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

To top

2004

  • Betsch, T., Haberstroh, S., Molter, B., & Glöckner, A. (2004). Oops, I did it again—Relapse errors in routinized decision making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 93, 62–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2003.09.002

To top

2003

  • Glöckner, A., & Grüner, K. (2003). Effizientes Online-Verfahren für die Personalentwicklung: 360° Führungsfeedback. Planung & Analyse, 2, 85–90.

To top

2002

  • Schubert, T., & Crusius, J. (2002). Five theses on the book problem: Presence in books, film and VR. In F. R. Gouveia & F. Biocca (Eds.), Proceedings of the fifth international workshop on presence (pp. 53–59). Porto, Portugal: Universidad Fernando Pessoa.  [pdf]

To top

2001

  • Betsch, T., Haberstroh, S., Glöckner, A., Haar, T., & Fiedler, K. (2001). The effects of routine strength on adaptation and information search in recurrent decision making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 84, 23–53. https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.2000.2916

To top

2000

  • Betsch, T., Glöckner, A., & Haberstroh, S. (2000). COMMERCE—A micro-world simulation to study routine maintenance and deviation in repeated decision making. Methods of Psychological Research, 5.  [full text]

To top